Kaosgirl
- Quote
- Report Post
- Posted: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 22:59:37 +0000
Audrey Eternal
How many of you have heard the story of what happened between Jayde Nicole and Joe Francis? Well here's the short verson of what happened, Joe Francis was hitting on a friend of both Jenner (her boyfriend) and Nicole. When Francis became very persistent, Jayde Nicole threw her drink on Francis. He then pulled Jaydes hair, punched her in the face, threw her to the ground, and then started kicking her (and yes this is true, there is security footage).
So my questions to you are...
1. Did Fancis have right to do that?
So my questions to you are...
1. Did Fancis have right to do that?
It's the same idea as responding to a slap in the face by pulling a gun. I don't think it's appropriate regardless of the genders involved - it's very much an excessive escalation of the incident.
Audrey Eternal
2. When is it acceptable to hit a woman?
In self defense, or mutually consensual 'rough play' situations.
It may also be an appropriate response in situations of persistent inappropriate behavior on her part, after more reasonable measures have been tried and exhausted. But that's not as clear a case - an escalation of some kind is called for (due to the failure of using other means to resolve the situation), but how far one can escalate or how much patience one should have with the 'inappropriate behavior' before escalating is debatable.
(Also, what counts as 'inappropriate behavior' isn't always clear either.)
Audrey Eternal
In my opinion, he did not have the right to do that to her. She poored a drink on him, he has the right to poor a drink on her (plus it would be more classy then what he did), nothing more. Not because she is a girl, but because she is a human being. What she did was wrong, but all she did was poor a drink on him and he reacted by pulling her hair, throwing her on the ground, and kicking her. There were plenty of better ways he could have haddled the situation.
I'm not sure she was entirely wrong in dumping the drink on him - that was an escalation as well, but from what you've told me he wasn't taking the clues that she wasn't interested. His behavior before that was bordering on harassment, which IMO justified her taking slightly more extreme measures.
(Noting that I'm speaking in terms of moral and ethical justification, not practical wisdom. Practical wisdom would have raised the question of whether she could handle the situation if he retaliated.)
