ohai_alyssa
Also, did you ever take into consideration the effect these three vices have on others? Just because you want to harm yourself doesn't mean that you have the rights to harm others. And don't go telling me that absolutely 100% of the people who do these things wouldn't be around others, 'cause you know that's just a lie. You may not, your friend may not, but by legalizing pot you'd just be upping the chances of more people doing it. Same for smoking and drinking. If they were both illegal, do you think as many people would do it? No. Some still would, but it would be a lower number. What about people who aren't involved in any of this, but their families are? Do you really think it's fair for secondhand smokers, children of alcoholics, and the friends and family of people wasting their time getting high deserve it?
If you're arguing you simply should be able to smoke pot because it's your body, you're ******** selfish. You may not ever harm someone in the process but you know damn well if it gets legalized someone else will. Most pot smokers don't smoke in public because even if they do have a card it would cause a hassle. So when amongst friends (people who want to be exposed to the pot), I don't see the problem. You might think it's a lie that not 100% of people smoke only amongst other smokers, but let's turn that around: Do you think enough smokers smoke around non-smokers that such is statistically significant? Have any evidence to support that?
And what's wrong with more people smoking pot, by choice? Why do you want to take away their right to make that choice?
Drinking alcohol is illegal for minors. But most of them (by a certain age somewhere in the teens) still do it. Do you think if it became legal, suddenly all kids would be drinking?
Also, what's wrong with being selfish? It's human nature. And how really is it selfish and harming others if I smoke alone or only with people who want to also smoke?