Recursive Paradox
Quote:
Now it's going to be your word against Merriam:
*buzzer sounds*
Wrong. Merriam is not an authority on academic usage. Dictionaries are layman terminology sources. The rare times they get it right related to academic terminology is when they say, "see science for real definition"
Then you admit that my definition is correct in Layman's terms. See, you keep satying "MEN ARE NEVER OPPRESSED. IMPOSSIBLE. But by the definition of oppression that MOST people understand, and how the word is MOST commonly used, yes, men absolutely ARE oppressed, by thesmelves AND by other groups. I don't think once I've ever claimed that men, "as a group," are oppressed, but even in that context they are, by man-haters, which do exist. I don't see why you'd deny that just because you don't consider it "statistically significant." As a man, I certianly
can tell you it's significant. And don't throw the tranny card down; I'm talking about men as a
gender.
Recursive Paradox
Quote:
Ah, that makes sense. But is it really that offensive or harmful if they are together in one word? I mosty put them together because I think "trans woman" looks more messy than "transwoman."
It's intensely offensive to me. Quite a few others. And it is used by a very large component of the population to other me as a "not true" woman. I.e. not a woman who is trans but this new third gendered thing called a transwoman. It's ******** up.
Are you SURE that is how they mean it? Is it possible they could just see it the way I did, and the way Blair described? I never split the term into "women and transwomen." Transwomen are, in my view, a type of woman, and just because it takes the form of one word doesn't mean I'm telling them they're not really women. If I really believed that, I wouldn't use the term "transman" either, because I know I'm a man, and I don't separate myself from other men.
Recursive Paradox
Quote:
I know what fake surprise looks like, most people are not very good actors.
You'd be surprised. People have a lot of practice with lying. XD We do live in America after all.
No, I wouldn't. I've worked in theater for roughly 10 years. I've seen hundreds of shitty auditions, I know what signs to look for. I also know a lot about behavioral psychology and what to look for in a liar.
Recursive Paradox
Quote:
While only a small group of women "hate" men, a lot of women say hateful and sexist things about men.
Proof?
You're an example.
Recursive Paradox
Quote:
And when I do state that I have an issue with it they pull the, "You're verbally abusing me! You're just telling me I can't say that because I'm a woman!" card.
So this is just anecdotal then? Are you confusing sexist things with say, true things? Like the fact that many women don't trust men because men don't wear signs that say, "good" and "bad" ergo forcing folk to make a judgment call that could get them raped?
No, it is not true that all men rape women, that all men take advantage of women, that all men abuse women, that all men forcibly dominate women, that all men are "chavanist pigs," etc. The statements really make the b***h a hypocrite.
Caution is one thing, talking trash is another.