This damn quote is driving me crazy

[PC Stuch Troll]

Xitemo

PC Stuch Troll

The Unblockable Spear Meets the Unpassable Shield. In The Parable Both are Destroyed.

Or this Happens.

But one of the conditions was that the object could -not- be destroyed.

No-Unblockable, Unpassable

Unstoppable, Unmovabale
It Says NoWhere "Undestroyable"

[Xitemo]

PC Stuch Troll

Xitemo

PC Stuch Troll

The Unblockable Spear Meets the Unpassable Shield. In The Parable Both are Destroyed.

Or this Happens.

But one of the conditions was that the object could -not- be destroyed.

No-Unblockable, Unpassable

Unstoppable, Unmovabale
It Says NoWhere "Undestroyable"

My first post:

"This is what happens when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object."

What would happen? No matter how I think about it, I can't come to an answer :/

Situation: The force has infinite energy and force, and the object is of course immovable and indestructable.

What would be the outcome?"

[pulchritudinous soup]

Xitemo

I see your point. But what about the deflection/passing through suggestions?

I was considering deflection but it wouldn't work. If it deflects, the object hasn't moved. Therefore, the immovable object is theoretically stronger than the force. But, that isn't true therefore deflection is an inadequate answer.

While passing through did break my head a little, it really cannot be thoroughly explained. First, to suggest that it did pass through an inanimate object would consist of either destruction of, or the force is merely equivalent to light. I'm studying physics at the moment, and I would go into further detail about the behaviour behind light and reflection but I'm not a good candidate to explain. I don't even like physics but it's part of the curriculum of my compulsory science course.

Anyway, as explained within science, light goes "through" but it does not "move". For it to go through while respecting the "immovable" aspect of the object would be incomprehensible. You cannot destroy an object without moving it while going through an object would not consist of moving it. Yes, those two are quite the twisters but even then, it's still illogical.

[pulchritudinous soup]

Xitemo

My first post:

"This is what happens when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object."

What would happen? No matter how I think about it, I can't come to an answer :/

Situation: The force has infinite energy and force, and the object is of course immovable and indestructable.

What would be the outcome?"

Realistically, it wouldn't happen. They would remain parallel; collision is impossible.

[Repellant]

Death and Misery

Repellant

Simple, really. It passes through, on the atomic or sub-atomic level.

Which can't happen if the immovable object is really immovable. It's frozen on that level and all underneath.

Ice is frozen but light passes through anyways.

[Xitemo]

pulchritudinous soup

Xitemo

I see your point. But what about the deflection/passing through suggestions?

I was considering deflection but it wouldn't work. If it deflects, the object hasn't moved. Therefore, the immovable object is theoretically stronger than the force. But, that isn't true therefore deflection is an inadequate answer.

While passing through did break my head a little, it really cannot be thoroughly explained. First, to suggest that it did pass through an inanimate object would consist of either destruction of, or the force is merely equivalent to light. I'm studying physics at the moment, and I would go into further detail about the behaviour behind light and reflection but I'm not a good candidate to explain. I don't even like physics but it's part of the curriculum of my compulsory science course.

Anyway, as explained within science, light goes "through" but it does not "move". For it to go through while respecting the "immovable" aspect of the object would be incomprehensible. You cannot destroy an object without moving it while going through an object would not consist of moving it. Yes, those two are quite the twisters but even then, it's still illogical.

Now I'm right back where I started DX

Couldn't the atoms of the force pass between the object?

[kierena]

watch the clip of x-men evolution where the jugernaut (considered an unstoppable force) takes down the blob (considered an unmovable force). That is what happens.

[Xitemo]

kierena

watch the clip of x-men evolution where the jugernaut (considered an unstoppable force) takes down the blob (considered an unmovable force). That is what happens.

Link?

[PC Stuch Troll]

Xitemo

PC Stuch Troll

Xitemo

PC Stuch Troll

The Unblockable Spear Meets the Unpassable Shield. In The Parable Both are Destroyed.

Or this Happens.

But one of the conditions was that the object could -not- be destroyed.

No-Unblockable, Unpassable

Unstoppable, Unmovabale
It Says NoWhere "Undestroyable"

My first post:

"This is what happens when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object."

What would happen? No matter how I think about it, I can't come to an answer :/

Situation: The force has infinite energy and force, and the object is of course immovable and indestructable.

What would be the outcome?"

So You Have a Paradox Where the World Ends.

[pulchritudinous soup]

Xitemo

pulchritudinous soup

Xitemo

I see your point. But what about the deflection/passing through suggestions?

I was considering deflection but it wouldn't work. If it deflects, the object hasn't moved. Therefore, the immovable object is theoretically stronger than the force. But, that isn't true therefore deflection is an inadequate answer.

While passing through did break my head a little, it really cannot be thoroughly explained. First, to suggest that it did pass through an inanimate object would consist of either destruction of, or the force is merely equivalent to light. I'm studying physics at the moment, and I would go into further detail about the behaviour behind light and reflection but I'm not a good candidate to explain. I don't even like physics but it's part of the curriculum of my compulsory science course.

Anyway, as explained within science, light goes "through" but it does not "move". For it to go through while respecting the "immovable" aspect of the object would be incomprehensible. You cannot destroy an object without moving it while going through an object would not consist of moving it. Yes, those two are quite the twisters but even then, it's still illogical.

Now I'm right back where I started DX

Couldn't the atoms of the force pass between the object?

Ugh, make me think more.

You have a point, I won't disagree.

Force
Inertia

Quote:

In physics, the normal force (occasionally N) is the component, perpendicular to the surface of contact, of the contact force exerted by, for example, the surface of a floor or wall, on an object, preventing the object from entering the floor or wall. In a static situation it is just enough to balance the forces acting on the object, such as the force with which the object pushes against the surface and friction.

Is it not possible that both an immovable object and an unstoppable force is the same thing? In order for it to be immovable, it must have enough force to counteract opposing forces. Theoretically, this is possible. Unless I've skimmed the definitions too quickly? I don't know...

[pulchritudinous soup]

A immovable object and an unstoppable force correlate and are synonymous. They exist through one another and is, therefore, a combination. Their existence is vital to one another. They are the same thing. I think I got it?!

[I got bored one day]

Repellant

Death and Misery

Repellant

Simple, really. It passes through, on the atomic or sub-atomic level.

Which can't happen if the immovable object is really immovable. It's frozen on that level and all underneath.

Ice is frozen but light passes through anyways.

. _ .' What a pun. Ice is not actually frozen on a subatomic level and you know it.

[Pseudo-Onkelos]

Lucky~9~Lives

Xitemo

"This is what happens when an unstoppable force meets an immovable object."

What would happen? No matter how I think about it, I can't come to an answer :/

It's a nonsense sentence, like 'what happens when a triangle has four-sides?' - if there is an unstoppable force, there can't be an immovable object by definition, and vice-versa.

Yes, it is a nonsense sentence. It's the unbreakable shield versus the spear that could penetrate through any shield. It's contradictory, thus illogical, and in reality, it's unrealistic.

[ShojoHana]

Resistance is futile!We are the borg.You will be assimilated.