Anat0lia
(?)Community Member
Offline
- Posted: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 23:34:38 +0000
Ghandi was a psycho assasine hired by England to break India in half. He was a double-agent.
John Kerry is a necrophiliac.
Buddha is in no position to teach about self-control; he is a man who most weighed more than a truck. He beat his wives, and slaughtered doves with his long, long finger nails.
You are all band freaks who steal money from your parents' wallets and have been addicted to alcohol since the age of nine. You therefore, will most likely end up in jail by the age of thirty.
Obvious lies. However, all such slanderous speech is allowed, in the 'real world'. Politics, especially when two people are running up againt each other. Sure, you can sue the opposition for Slander, but what does that do? You gain money, but in the long run, you most likely have lost the elections and have taken to living at home, alone, with empty pizza boxes stacked all over the place.
Should slander be allowed in political situations? Should it be allowed at all? Is making your slanderer pay a significant amount of money good enough to make you feel better; I mean, is money a good substitute for your once-tolerable reputation?
What is stopping me from making things up about any body here? I do not believe that 'maturity' would be significant, given the fact that most slanderers have nothing to lose, except certain lines that dictate common decency?
Word travels fast, yes, and it seems that there is no stopping it.
How about some slandering, yo.
John Kerry is a necrophiliac.
Buddha is in no position to teach about self-control; he is a man who most weighed more than a truck. He beat his wives, and slaughtered doves with his long, long finger nails.
You are all band freaks who steal money from your parents' wallets and have been addicted to alcohol since the age of nine. You therefore, will most likely end up in jail by the age of thirty.
Obvious lies. However, all such slanderous speech is allowed, in the 'real world'. Politics, especially when two people are running up againt each other. Sure, you can sue the opposition for Slander, but what does that do? You gain money, but in the long run, you most likely have lost the elections and have taken to living at home, alone, with empty pizza boxes stacked all over the place.
Should slander be allowed in political situations? Should it be allowed at all? Is making your slanderer pay a significant amount of money good enough to make you feel better; I mean, is money a good substitute for your once-tolerable reputation?
What is stopping me from making things up about any body here? I do not believe that 'maturity' would be significant, given the fact that most slanderers have nothing to lose, except certain lines that dictate common decency?
Word travels fast, yes, and it seems that there is no stopping it.
How about some slandering, yo.
