Aporeia
(?)Community Member
- Report Post
- Posted: Fri, 08 Feb 2013 11:01:01 +0000
YahuShalum
False Dichotomy
YahuShalum
False Dichotomy
YahuShalum
Let's talk about first shot. Kent state massacre.
Now what if said first shot comes from the crowd but is an agent working to get gun control.
Now what if said first shot comes from the crowd but is an agent working to get gun control.
Quote:
Now let's take you out of the equation and focus on only guns and not slitting throats with a knife. When would you be willing to pick up a gun and defend others. Let's say worse case scenario where you'd want something to get the job done. My point is you do have that line that once crossed you will want a weapon powerful enough to defeat your foes, or at least level the playing field just a little to your advantage.
Excuse me, if that kind of thing were to happen, and I'm using the word IF very strongly, fighting is not the answer. Not being there is the answer.
Quote:
I didn't say "Our" military now did I. So before you pick up a gun and fight for anyone or yourself, you'd rather die? "Fighting is not the answer" Then why did you suggest slitting throats.
Quote:
You have to have a case in your mind in which you'd want to have firepower. Right?
Guns are great until you're talking about a group of well trained, armored men who are all probably a better shot than you.
Quote:
You need to stop avoiding the question. What is the case in your mind you'd want firepower. You know you have one.
Yea, there are cases I'd like to have a gun. Options are cool. I like options.
Now can we please get out of fantasy land? The government isn't coming to kill us all. They won't in our lifetimes, I can guarantee that.