 |
 People need to stop talking about weapons they don't know how to use. </topic> |
|
|
Was that addressed to the OP or to the Weaboos?
|
 |
|
|
"robots eat computers" People need to stop talking about weapons they don't know how to use. </topic> ...umm...we kind of DO know what we're talking about, seeing as everyone who supports this thread has some knowledge of either weapon. So...yeah. |
|
|
Let me start by, who needs weapons anyway? You don't really need to lisence a sword. BUT! I supose it all depends on a person's personal preferance. If you want to join the renissance travaling circus, or be a idiot and join a gang. Swords and guns aren't needed! UNless you're a police officer...or a ninja! I mean to say though, I've got maybe 10 swords hanging up around my room, sure, I could kill somebody with one, accident or on purpose. Though, I'll never hang up a gun. Leisure guns aren't that bad I think. Buy hey, I'd rather be hit by a BB gun or a painball gun than a .22 or 10mm!
I forgot what my argument was... Personal preferance people! |
|
|
|
Think that person is speaking to the people who don't know what they are talking about.
So yeah, weeaboos. |
|
|
"CaughtUpInBetween" Let me start by, who needs weapons anyway? You don't really need to lisence a sword. BUT! I supose it all depends on a person's personal preferance. If you want to join the renissance travaling circus, or be a idiot and join a gang. Swords and guns aren't needed! UNless you're a police officer...or a ninja! I mean to say though, I've got maybe 10 swords hanging up around my room, sure, I could kill somebody with one, accident or on purpose. Though, I'll never hang up a gun. Leisure guns aren't that bad I think. Buy hey, I'd rather be hit by a BB gun or a painball gun than a .22 or 10mm! I forgot what my argument was... Personal preferance people!  Yes why should we have the ability to defend ourselves at all? Tis much better to constantly be the victim of everyone who has the weapons rather than to have them yourself. stare |
|
|
|
"Dayhock" the wepon dos not make it what it is its the person if some one sneeksup and ither shoots you or slits your throat there a coward and have no honor ts not the weapons fault i my self per fer a sword and to face my opponint face to face and to do as much i must also have a valad reason ts not like ima fight evy one i dont have to as for guns im well traned with them as well and have no problem using one ts just my prefrince. so say what you well ts the cowardly ppl who give a weapon a bad name. Punctuation is a good thing =] |
|
|
"Texinadawolf" "Eccentric Enigma" Any person who would spend years of their life training to kill your fellow man means that they've already forfeited any chance of greatness, or of being a human, because they lack the brain power and integrity to work out a reasonable solution to whatever petty quarrel they may have. Furthermore, you're overlooking the most important part of you argument, that being its all APPLES and ORANGES! Both serve primarily different killing functions, the sword being short range, and the gun replacing bows as a long range. While you can pistolwhip someone or throw your sword through their skull (a la monty python's holy grail) both are still superior in their respective category. And let's not all forget what happened in the pulp fiction pawn shop. The People who spend years training to kill do so to protect the peace Therefore, whoever wishes for peace, let him prepare for war. Pistols are short ranged combat weapons and are thus superior to the sword axe mace and so on. If you want peace then lay down your arms and work in harmony rather than building up the next biggest stock of weaponry until one being or nation decides they "need"(want) more and will use their forceful, rather than diplomatic, armaments to do so. When everyone holds a gun for defense, is it not only because you fear the attack from the gun of another? Violence only begets more violence, even with retaliation under the flimsy guise of protection. Im sure you've all heard an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind. As for pistols being short range, you certainly cant pass off the hand axe or throwing knives/stars. Even still, to see any sort or armed combat between any of these craptasticly debatable and deplorable weapons is just not practical in this day and age. The only conclusion that will be reached is when some jerkass on the other side of the globe with his finger on the button (trigger if you will) blows up your house, family, and dog and all survivors, the thugs and the shut ins, can finally agree to wrap their lips around the peaceful and protectice barrel to avoid the painful demise of nuclear fall out.v 3nodding |
|
|
|
"Eccentric Enigma" "Texinadawolf" "Eccentric Enigma" Any person who would spend years of their life training to kill your fellow man means that they've already forfeited any chance of greatness, or of being a human, because they lack the brain power and integrity to work out a reasonable solution to whatever petty quarrel they may have. Furthermore, you're overlooking the most important part of you argument, that being its all APPLES and ORANGES! Both serve primarily different killing functions, the sword being short range, and the gun replacing bows as a long range. While you can pistolwhip someone or throw your sword through their skull (a la monty python's holy grail) both are still superior in their respective category. And let's not all forget what happened in the pulp fiction pawn shop. The People who spend years training to kill do so to protect the peace Therefore, whoever wishes for peace, let him prepare for war. Pistols are short ranged combat weapons and are thus superior to the sword axe mace and so on. If you want peace then lay down your arms and work in harmony rather than building up the next biggest stock of weaponry until one being or nation decides they "need"(want) more and will use their forceful, rather than diplomatic, armaments to do so. When everyone holds a gun for defense, is it not only because you fear the attack from the gun of another? Im sure you've all heard an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind. As for pistols being short range, you certainly cant pass off the hand axe or throwing knives/stars. Even still, to see any sort or armed combat between any of these craptasticly debatable and deplorable weapons is just not practical in this day and age. The only conclusion that will be reached is when some jerkass on the other side of the globe with his finger on the button (trigger if you will) blows up your house, family, and dog and all survivors, the thugs and the shut ins, can finally agree to wrap their lips around the peaceful and protectice barrel to avoid the painful demise of nuclear fall out.v 3nodding "If you Wish for Peace, Prepare For War" Good luck when you are VIOLENTLY TAKEN OVER by your enemy when you laid down your arms. Tell me, I enter your home and I hack at you with a machete. Will you not defend yourself? You seem to be advocating that you NOT FIGHT BACK no matter what is happening. I sense uber-pacifist bullshit, young skywalker! |
|
|
"Eccentric Enigma" "Texinadawolf" "Eccentric Enigma" Any person who would spend years of their life training to kill your fellow man means that they've already forfeited any chance of greatness, or of being a human, because they lack the brain power and integrity to work out a reasonable solution to whatever petty quarrel they may have. Furthermore, you're overlooking the most important part of you argument, that being its all APPLES and ORANGES! Both serve primarily different killing functions, the sword being short range, and the gun replacing bows as a long range. While you can pistolwhip someone or throw your sword through their skull (a la monty python's holy grail) both are still superior in their respective category. And let's not all forget what happened in the pulp fiction pawn shop. The People who spend years training to kill do so to protect the peace Therefore, whoever wishes for peace, let him prepare for war. Pistols are short ranged combat weapons and are thus superior to the sword axe mace and so on. If you want peace then lay down your arms and work in harmony rather than building up the next biggest stock of weaponry until one being or nation decides they "need"(want) more and will use their forceful, rather than diplomatic, armaments to do so. When everyone holds a gun for defense, is it not only because you fear the attack from the gun of another? Violence only begets more violence, even with retaliation under the flimsy guise of protection. Im sure you've all heard an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind. As for pistols being short range, you certainly cant pass off the hand axe or throwing knives/stars. Even still, to see any sort or armed combat between any of these craptasticly debatable and deplorable weapons is just not practical in this day and age. The only conclusion that will be reached is when some jerkass on the other side of the globe with his finger on the button (trigger if you will) blows up your house, family, and dog and all survivors, the thugs and the shut ins, can finally agree to wrap their lips around the peaceful and protectice barrel to avoid the painful demise of nuclear fall out.v 3nodding We live in a warring state of affairs. I'm sure you know the phrase nice guys finish last? Hand axes and throwing knives are ineffective weapons to wield. |
|
|
|
"uryu ishida" "Eccentric Enigma" If you want peace then lay down your arms and work in harmony rather than building up the next biggest stock of weaponry until one being or nation decides they "need"(want) more and will use their forceful, rather than diplomatic, armaments to do so. When everyone holds a gun for defense, is it not only because you fear the attack from the gun of another? Im sure you've all heard an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind. As for pistols being short range, you certainly cant pass off the hand axe or throwing knives/stars. Even still, to see any sort or armed combat between any of these craptasticly debatable and deplorable weapons is just not practical in this day and age. The only conclusion that will be reached is when some jerkass on the other side of the globe with his finger on the button (trigger if you will) blows up your house, family, and dog and all survivors, the thugs and the shut ins, can finally agree to wrap their lips around the peaceful and protectice barrel to avoid the painful demise of nuclear fall out.v 3nodding "If you Wish for Peace, Prepare For War" Good luck when you are VIOLENTLY TAKEN OVER by your enemy when you laid down your arms. Tell me, I enter your home and I hack at you with a machete. Will you not defend yourself? You seem to be advocating that you NOT FIGHT BACK no matter what is happening. I sense uber-pacifist bullshit, young skywalker! And for what petty, selfcentered reason would you attack a harmless individual who never did anything to you? Just because you have the threat of physical harm you think that people will bow to you? You're the prime example, boy-o. |
|
|
"Eccentric Enigma" "uryu ishida" "Eccentric Enigma" If you want peace then lay down your arms and work in harmony rather than building up the next biggest stock of weaponry until one being or nation decides they "need"(want) more and will use their forceful, rather than diplomatic, armaments to do so. When everyone holds a gun for defense, is it not only because you fear the attack from the gun of another? Im sure you've all heard an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind. As for pistols being short range, you certainly cant pass off the hand axe or throwing knives/stars. Even still, to see any sort or armed combat between any of these craptasticly debatable and deplorable weapons is just not practical in this day and age. The only conclusion that will be reached is when some jerkass on the other side of the globe with his finger on the button (trigger if you will) blows up your house, family, and dog and all survivors, the thugs and the shut ins, can finally agree to wrap their lips around the peaceful and protectice barrel to avoid the painful demise of nuclear fall out.v 3nodding "If you Wish for Peace, Prepare For War" Good luck when you are VIOLENTLY TAKEN OVER by your enemy when you laid down your arms. Tell me, I enter your home and I hack at you with a machete. Will you not defend yourself? You seem to be advocating that you NOT FIGHT BACK no matter what is happening. I sense uber-pacifist bullshit, young skywalker! And for what petty, selfcentered reason would you attack a harmless individual who never did anything to you? Just because you have the threat of physical harm you think that people will bow to you? You're the prime example, boy-o. |
|
|
|
"Dion Albert Necurat" We live in a warring state of affairs. I'm sure you know the phrase nice guys finish last? Hand axes and throwing knives are ineffective weapons to wield. So why not just kill off anyone who is a threat? Every gun toting blue blooded american, iraqi, antarctican should be taken to slaughter for the potential harm they can bring then. It's the potential for evil in a mans heart that should be feared, not some sped with a semi automatic weapon or badass katana. |
|
|
"Eccentric Enigma" "Dion Albert Necurat" We live in a warring state of affairs. I'm sure you know the phrase nice guys finish last? Hand axes and throwing knives are ineffective weapons to wield. So why not just kill off anyone who is a threat? Every gun toting blue blooded american, iraqi, antarctican should be taken to slaughter for the potential harm they can bring then. It's the potential for evil in a mans heart that should be feared, not some sped with a semi automatic weapon or badass katana. So you assume that anyone with a weapon of any kind is evil, despite the good they can do with one? Good thing the two are forms of opinion, eh? |
|
|
