Heather Ann Potter
Tuah
Heather Ann Potter
Tuah
Heather Ann Potter
I cant think of a single martial art anywhere that uses guns. Martial arts are fighting forms, with the body. The weapons used, swords, staves, sai, eskrima, etc are extensions of ones self. A gun is not an extension of ones self. Although, I will say that in my training against an oponent with a gun, in some instances it is prevelant to shoot them with their own gun. The best option is to get the gun out of the fight and then decimate them.
I also agree on the belt system. Especially when it comes to belt factory dojos. I HATE belt factory dojos. I have been doing this for four years and just recently acheived my 4th belt (purple) in a 6 belt system.
A martial art is a military art. Just as the samurai uses a bow in times of war, so too can a gun be a viable weapon that requires finesse and technique.
Depends. I still cant think of an art that uses guns... some arts dont even use weapons.
Samurai learned to use guns as a part of their military training.
"samurai" is not a martial art. Samurai were japanese soldiers.
Samurai where semi equivalent to the European "knight". Now I don't know much about Samurai since the majority of Japanese culture is crap to me, but I do know what a "knight" is and I know the similarity of them to a Japanese samurai. They had their own martial arts, Jujitsu was one of them. European's had their own type and didn't care to actually call it anything thats why it is called "European Martial arts". It involved the use of Shields,Swords,Axes,Maces,Polearms (Spears,halberds,longer axes etc) Bows,Crossbows,Javelins,Slings,Warhammers,daggers and other more rare types of weapons. It also had a wrestling type of mélee combat a lot like Systema...It actually more or less is systema just not used in our modern world.