See, this is really interesting...
Originally, the poll question was: "Is it wrong to prevent suicide?"
The results, around the time I close the poll, favored a "No" response. I believe the ratio was around 66% against 33%.
Now, the results say 80% to 20% that people think suicide should be a right.
I hadn't intended upon seeing this contrast, but rather I decided to change the poll question after realizing that it, and the initial post, were poorly worded and implied blame. Now, however, it is apparent that phrasing it as a defense of a person's right, rather than an attack against the person encroaching on that right, results in more people agreeing with it.
Like I've said, my intent was never to assign blame to people who act to prevent a suicide. This re-worded version of the poll is much clearer about that.
It seems the comparison from these two different poll results confirms that provoking a sympathetic response rather than an aggressive response is more effective, if you want to get someone to agree with you. Of course, there are a lot of examples of this I'm sure, one of them being the recent "right to farm" amendment that passed in Missouri. The "right to farm" bill actually is about protecting corporate big-agriculture interests over small farmers' (and organic farmers in particular) rights.