Sexy English Teacher
(?)Community Member
- Posted: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 17:11:16 +0000
We're getting pretty god damn advanced in science, and we've got all these cool things to show for it. The fact that, something like 5000% more people can eat actual meat daily than a couple centuries ago is somewhat proof of that.
And now, just like the cloning debate, comes all sorts of really hard analytical questions that we probably never thought we would be arguing about. This time, instead of cloning, it's our meat.
Now...meat is...pretty god damn wasteful. I mean, even after you get over the moral ramifications that every piece of meat you ate had to be killed, there's all sorts of geopolitical and environmental concerns caused by the production of meat. Animals, depending on the meat you are buying, have to be raised, and in this time they use up a ridiculous amount of resources. Each pig eats something like 800 pounds of food in it's lifetime. It has to be quality food too, like you can't just feed pigs anything you want anymore because they're going to be too filled with toxins to eat. In the end you get an animal that's like, 300 pounds.
So basically, every pig you feed from birth to slaughter is decreasing the food supply by more than half. It's probably more efficient than this, seeing as how manure is used to plant the next crop, but altogether you can probably see how this process is way less efficient than just feeding people the food used to raise the pig.
In vitro meat is meat raised in a test tube. It's just flesh that is chemically identical to different types of meat without the animal attached. It probably has the eventual consequence that we won't need to slaughter animals as soon as we make sure it's safe for consumption and we get over the fact it's not real animal.
Yes, we'll eventually be able to grow edible flesh from any animal without the moral ramifications of slaughter, or the environmental ramifications of raising them.
Of course, this means we can also make human flesh. There would be no moral ramification of destruction of human life, and there would also not be any medical concern because human flesh will be able to be grown clean of any toxins or disease that could harm other humans. So is it morally responsible to allow people to consume in-vitro human flesh?
And now, just like the cloning debate, comes all sorts of really hard analytical questions that we probably never thought we would be arguing about. This time, instead of cloning, it's our meat.
Now...meat is...pretty god damn wasteful. I mean, even after you get over the moral ramifications that every piece of meat you ate had to be killed, there's all sorts of geopolitical and environmental concerns caused by the production of meat. Animals, depending on the meat you are buying, have to be raised, and in this time they use up a ridiculous amount of resources. Each pig eats something like 800 pounds of food in it's lifetime. It has to be quality food too, like you can't just feed pigs anything you want anymore because they're going to be too filled with toxins to eat. In the end you get an animal that's like, 300 pounds.
So basically, every pig you feed from birth to slaughter is decreasing the food supply by more than half. It's probably more efficient than this, seeing as how manure is used to plant the next crop, but altogether you can probably see how this process is way less efficient than just feeding people the food used to raise the pig.
In vitro meat is meat raised in a test tube. It's just flesh that is chemically identical to different types of meat without the animal attached. It probably has the eventual consequence that we won't need to slaughter animals as soon as we make sure it's safe for consumption and we get over the fact it's not real animal.
Yes, we'll eventually be able to grow edible flesh from any animal without the moral ramifications of slaughter, or the environmental ramifications of raising them.
Of course, this means we can also make human flesh. There would be no moral ramification of destruction of human life, and there would also not be any medical concern because human flesh will be able to be grown clean of any toxins or disease that could harm other humans. So is it morally responsible to allow people to consume in-vitro human flesh?