Roih Uvet
(?)Community Member
- Report Post
- Posted: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 17:17:12 +0000
Riviera de la Mancha
Roih Uvet
Riviera de la Mancha
Roih Uvet
Lucky~9~Lives
I think she's referring to your interpretations, not the statistics themselves.
Your "interpretation" is much more than a simple reversal.
What it actually consists of is first you taking a source and then totally misunderstanding a term within the source that has nothing to do with the argument the source is discussing. You then take this completely new understanding and substitute it for another word in an entirely different context. You then take that new context with a new term and flip that order, totally ignoring that the previous context's order can't be flipped in a sort of cart-before-the-horse setup.
So its a couple of layers of wackiness. Much more than a simple reversal.
Ah, so the classic "two wrongs make a right" defense?
Hell, even in the source I linked on its own, they assume that all the accusations of rapes are actual rapes. They even go as far as to cite a source of a survey where the definition of rape is expanded to include things like nagging or buyer's remorse because they were getting buzzed at a bar, and counts all those women who claimed to be on the receiving end of that as having been raped.
I mean, if that s**t is rape, then ******** it, saying that s**t on the phone to some stranger, even without a formal complaint issued, is a rape accusation.