stealthmongoose
Suicidesoldier#1
Robot Macai
black_wing_angel
Je Nique vos Merdiers
black_wing_angel
In terms of the Occupiers, I just don't really sympathize with them, because I saw a video of them just provoking the riot control cops. Literally yelling "YOU'RE ON THE WRONG SIDE!"
I'm like "they're just standing there, overseeing the protest. They're just making sure your asses don't step out of line, and get violent...that's not picking a side. It's mediating, you ******** idiots!
OF COURSE! What could
possibly be provocative about sending in a crack squad of heavily-armed and armored thugs to stand around and mean mug people while they wait for them to do something wrong? It's not as if riot police ever make mistakes or start conflict.
OH WAIT A MINUTE
The best you have, is Canada? Nique, I am disappoint.
And yes, it does happen. I never said it doesn't. But that doesn't mean it's ALWAYS that way. And I specifically saw footage of occupiers provoking the riot control squad.
And maybe it's just me, but if there's going to be a lot of people gathered around in a tight space, I kinda want some security in the area. A group as potentially volatile as a protest? Heavily armored security. Just to be safe.
And the golden rule of not getting your a** slapped in handcuffs: Don't provoke the police.
If a police officer "provokes" me, can I beat the s**t out of him for it?
Like this one time I got pulled over and was given a seatbelt ticket even though I was wearing my seatbelt. I was even asked to exit the vehicle to get searched. I got in some trouble in that town in the past, so the police there just have it in for me.
This police officer was clearly provoking me. Given the facts of my case, would you find it acceptable for me to crack him upside the head with a baseball bat repeatedly until he went limp and stopped "resisting"?
First of all you'd be using a weapon, second of all he wasn't attacking you with a weapon so there's no reason to use a weapon to defend yourself.
Police officers aren't allowed to kill people at random just becuase they are "provoked" but it you assault one yeah, you are provoking them.
Why be mean or act stupid?
Calmly and cooly get out the car and do whatever unless they obviously are trying to kill you for no reason or something.
Because the standard for respect isn't what size gun you have on you. Fear is more equatable to force than respect. That being said, there's nothing that you can really say that justifieds a PMC squad paid by taxpayers to uphold a standard of law they themselves do not see fit to follow.
They constantly bring weapons to the party, they work for independent companies to unlawfully remove undesirables (Not to be confused with criminals) and to be honest, most of them probably don't know the law to begin with.
Any time you elect a group to uphold ideals that are higher than the rest of the community, there is going to be a massive abuse of power. This does not make that abuse excusable.
If you don't want me to bring a fire bomb to a riot shield fight, don't bring a riot shield to a speech fight.
Don't bring a riot shield?
What the ******** is wrong with you?
If I was walking around the street with a ******** bullet proof vest on that isn't an invitation for an attack, that's just an intelligent precaution.
The very fact you'd even consider bringing a fire bomb to a supposed peaceful rally implies it's almost necessary for a person to bring a riot shield.
And, what if it's not for you, it's just for the FEW people who are taking things out of control?
You're going to attack them becuase they're going to prepare themselves to take away the people who are actually doing bad thing, ruining your supposed peaceful protest by making the police come down there in the first place?
People who protect themselves from harm with precautions so when the time comes they can put you in a head lock or taze you even if you DO make an assault on some person's life?
******** you.
You'd attack someone becuase they are trying to put themselves in a position where if they DO get attacked that they don't have to respond violently to defend themselves, taking it upon themselves to prepare themselves so that if they do get attacked, they need not respond violently?
Go do the world a favor...
/sigh
By giving a police officer body armor you are essentially making so they can put themselves into situations they ordinarily couldn't do without facing death or injury.
If a police officer isn't wearing armor and is attacked he WILL fight back, violently, to defend himself, killing the target if necessary.
If the police need not defend himself, becuase he has armor on, or say, is like wolverine, or is say, invincible, then we need not worry about him responding violently. He can defend himself without worry. I support the use of body armor on all police officers, to virtually make them invincible- then they won't even need guns! They could get shot, and not have to worry about dieing- even use themselves as human shields if necessary. Then they could tazer their target or physically restrain them without worry of having to maybe kill them in their own self defense.
THIS IS JUST COMMON SENSE.
If you're that much of a moron I don't know what to do...
100
100
200
0
0
0
