dolly milk
(?)Community Member
- Report Post
- Posted: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 22:00:07 +0000
Nitroxwolf
What I'm trying to say is, if the woman haves the child with the man wanting an abortion, the man has to pay child support. But if a woman aborts the child, and the man wants the baby, he gets no compensation, or anything, he just gets to live his own life pretending like it never happened? Please tell me how that's equally fair.
It isn't equally fair, that's why I'm against it. And that's also why I brought up the issue of consent papers. If the man wants nothing to do with the child, and is clearly not consenting to paying child support, it's best to get that point through in an early stage of the pregnancy, so the woman can then decide: do I want to be miserable and take care of a child on my own, or should I abort it? In this kind of situation, the woman usually only really wants to keep the child because she believes that her partner will also be involved, and that she will have no worries or complications raising it because she'll have his help. But that's not always the case.
By giving birth to a child when she clearly knows the man wants nothing to do with it, she is consenting to caring for it on her own, no child support involved. That's how I see it.
By giving birth to a child when she clearly knows the man wants nothing to do with it, she is consenting to caring for it on her own, no child support involved. That's how I see it.