Kilickt
I am aware that prostitution exists globally, You misunderstand. I meant if it were legalized globally, there could potentially be more options for prostitutes. Including rights.
Legalization of the trade should offer more protection to women who want to do it. And more to those who don't.
I repeat that current legislation should protect prostitutes from coercion and violence. But it doesn't seem to keep the sleaze trade under sufficient control. A woman locked in a brothel can't go to the police. A woman at the mercy of a brutal man who has taken her passport and threatened her family can't go to the police.
I repeat - look at Amsterdam. Legalisation MAY add to the volume of the trade a caste of damaged women who collude with their abusers. But threats and trafficking and drug addiction are still used to fill the brothels. Legalisation makes it much harder to get anything done about that. Because the law now can't just arrest pimps for living off women - they have to get credible testimony in court from abused, scared, junkie teenagers - against the people who have spent months 'breaking' them to the 'trade'. The easiest bit of the crime to target is the sale of these abused girls. When you legalise that end-user transaction, you make it harder to prove any of the crimes behind it.
Kilickt
It is my thought that the act should be viewed as honest and not immoral - that the women and men are respected - that you would be ********
willing men or women who want your money. Illegal prostitution and abuse is not my concern in this discussion - only that people should have the right to sell sexual acts.
I suggest that you go found a utopian community somewhere and create a society very different from the one in which we live.
Because, in this society, prostitution is about using money as power - paying for the simulation of an intimate act. If all the punters were buying was friction to satisfy animal instinct, this could easily be provided by a vending machine.
Prostitution is about the abuse of young women. Maybe not in Imaginaria. But in the real world.
I'm not expounding an abstract philosophical position here - I'm talking about legislation in the real world, attempting to minimise a pathological behaviour - a form of violence against women.
Kilickt
Obviously, to be quite frank with you, I don't give a damn about what happens in the next generation of people. Especially not in this topic.
I assume then, that you think the above statement bolsters some sort of hedonistic argument?
And by extension of this 'argument', you don't give a monkey's curse about global warming.
That the spiralling national debt doesn't worry you much - and will worry you less as you age.
And perhaps, extrapolating from your statement, that you would hope to die with your credit cards all maxx'd out?
This is a digression, but I'll point out that saying you don't care about future effects of your actions will not encourage your credit providers to increase your cards' limits. And similarly, it won't encourage anyone to enter into an agreement with you, or to aid or support your causes. Because its a sociopathic statement.