False Dichotomy
Suicidesoldier#1
False Dichotomy
Suicidesoldier#1
False Dichotomy
Suicidesoldier#1
Putting graphic displays of sex in children shows would be... basically, putting porn in there.
Sex ED is not the same as having starfire and robin bang each other graphically on TV. Which lots of people say they would be fine with because apparently sex in no way has a mental aspect to it that could ever effect children.
Who said anything about graphic displays?
The OP, lots of other people. O_o
No, they didn't. Read it again.
Ugh.
The OP literally said that they draw sex cartoons and see nothing wrong with children seeing those types of things.
I mean I actually did read it, the first time.
Hell I had a conversation.
It's like not even up to debate.
xp You mean that whole conversation that started with you talking about "porny sex," and her saying "wait, you know we're talking about TV, right?"
Yea, I'm pretty sure you started all of that.
She says she doesn't consider her drawings of sex to be graphic or gross.
I do; hence she's going to say she doesn't think sex is gross at all, when I consider all sex gross.
Graphic depictions are just that, " visual presentations".
She's okay with that, hence she's okay with graphic sex.
All porn is, is graphic sex. I mean what is porn, or graphic sex, other than porn?
So essentially, it's porn. I mean it doesn't get a lot simpler than this.