I'm a male, and I'm starting to sympathize with feminists

[Riviera de la Mancha]

Penguins Eat Socks

ErectusWalksAmongstUs

Most of you morons do not know woman, you do not understand them and you do not value them, and by extension you do not deserve women or have their company.

You spent all this time ranting and raving about how women are so mistreated and misunderstood and men are pigs and nobody understands except for you, and yet you refer to them as if they're a prize to be earned?

Being deserving of something does not make it a prize obtained. It merely means that one has to qualify to even be considered.

[Penguins Eat Socks]

Riviera de la Mancha

Penguins Eat Socks

ErectusWalksAmongstUs

Most of you morons do not know woman, you do not understand them and you do not value them, and by extension you do not deserve women or have their company.

You spent all this time ranting and raving about how women are so mistreated and misunderstood and men are pigs and nobody understands except for you, and yet you refer to them as if they're a prize to be earned?

Being deserving of something does not make it a prize obtained. It merely means that one has to qualify to even be considered.

And what would these qualifications be? Do I have to understand the complete workings of the female mind to "deserve" female company? Am I too immature to have a girlfriend because I think South Park is funny?

[Riviera de la Mancha]

Penguins Eat Socks

Riviera de la Mancha

Penguins Eat Socks

ErectusWalksAmongstUs

Most of you morons do not know woman, you do not understand them and you do not value them, and by extension you do not deserve women or have their company.

You spent all this time ranting and raving about how women are so mistreated and misunderstood and men are pigs and nobody understands except for you, and yet you refer to them as if they're a prize to be earned?

Being deserving of something does not make it a prize obtained. It merely means that one has to qualify to even be considered.

And what would these qualifications be? Do I have to understand the complete workings of the female mind to "deserve" female company? Am I too immature to have a girlfriend because I think South Park is funny?

I am not sure; I did not write the OP. I was merely pointing out an issue with your argument.

I personally would say that if one is a generally good and righteous man, then one deserves the blessing of female company.

[Penguins Eat Socks]

Am I wrong in thinking that treating women as if they're some form of deity who demands the utmost respect is some form or another of objectification?

[Shuyajin]

For a man to agree with feminists....He must have his balls surgically removed.

May a donation to do so find its way to all males who are.

[Penguins Eat Socks]

I could say that he's not a pansy because he agrees with feminists, but rather because he's projecting his insecurities onto his peers and is using that projection to run away from the fact that he likely views women in the same manner that he supposedly despises. But, I'm gonna eat some cereal instead.

[Yoshpet]

Your personality seems dangerously manipulative. Why do you feel the need to deceive men online and create unstable and impossible relationships? You are simply adding to the agony and confusion of the genders that you claim to oppose.

[Charon Eris]

I agree with you.

[Luz Melian]

SosukeSuigetsu

So men are ******** and women are saints?

Please, women lie more than men do, and women are the first to try and use their tits to get out of a speeding ticket or get a promotion. Men treat women like ******** because the majority of women act like them.

I also hate when women act like this, but I believe that "the majority" is very far from reality.
And I must say I like the OP; unfortunately what it says is true for a lot of men cause from what I see a lot of them are disrespectful jerks.

[BaeKim]

Stuch BSc

Generalisations for the win?

QFT

[Methcalarjalope]

Stuch BSc

ErectusWalksAmongstUs

Well for any number of reasons it seems to be true of the vast majority. Listen to how pathetic most peoples' relationship stories are. They get in petty fights over s**t like whether the dinner one of them cooked was good or not. This is because their relationships are unstable, because they were initially only based on sex.

Good lord, you're a generalisation machine!

Translation: Stuch is not at all like the OP story. There have always been gentlemen and scoundrels. At times it seems as if hte scoundrels have the gents outnumbered but that is sometimes because good men will occasional dip to lower levels that is truly in keeping with their souls.

[Methcalarjalope]

Yoshpet

Your personality seems dangerously manipulative. Why do you feel the need to deceive men online and create unstable and impossible relationships? You are simply adding to the agony and confusion of the genders that you claim to oppose.

I mostly speak to women who have created male accounts and they report that they are received differently as a male than as a female. However, the scientific data is not in. Just saying. I think everyone should try it.

[Overexposure]

You manipulated a lonely basement dweller and are using that as your basis for how men act? While his behavior is certainly crude, the only despicable one in that relationship is you.

You have never examined the behavior of modern men. You have examined the behavior of teenagers and the immature. And using the internet as a way to determine misogyny is similar to me determining global anti-semitism by going to Hezebollah.

For a fun hands on type experiment you can do, go to the grocery store and pick up a women's magazine. Cosmo or Women's health or whatever they sell there. There will be an article on sex in it. Every time, all the time. Taking the stance that only men are looking for the "perfect way to get more sex" is somewhat foolish. (Grabbing Lawn and Garden or Home Decorating do not count as women's magazines by the way.)

You know everything there is to know about women? Is that so? Perhaps you mean to say, "I know quite a bit about the woman I'm dating right now and can make pretty good guesses as to what she wants"?

Out of curiosity, you specified you only act that way towards women you are currently IN a relationship with, are the ones you aren't dating chattel? Useless whores, unworthy of your consideration and respect because they're not putting out for you at that moment?


Wait. Hold the presses. A non homosexual male finds men to be disgusting. Jesus, we've been doing it wrong all along. Who would've guessed that you would prefer the company of women?

inb4 lolitrollu.jpg

[Repellant]

Methcalarjalope

Yoshpet

Your personality seems dangerously manipulative. Why do you feel the need to deceive men online and create unstable and impossible relationships? You are simply adding to the agony and confusion of the genders that you claim to oppose.

I mostly speak to women who have created male accounts and they report that they are received differently as a male than as a female. However, the scientific data is not in. Just saying. I think everyone should try it.

There is a difference between neutral, honest net-trannying and purposefully baiting jerks.

I'll have to assume OP did the latter.