Welcome to Gaia! :: Homosexuality Is NOT A Sin: What Christ Said And More | Forum

Register FaceBook Login Login

 

 
GST

Welcome to Gaia's forums, where millions of members gather to discuss random stuff, make new friends,
complain about life, argue about nothing, laugh at dumb pictures, discuss serious issues and/or curse like sailors.

Lurking is creepy. Quit skulking in the shadows and join the conversation!

Register to reply

Advertisement
Share:  
forum:26, topic:22055569
Queen Kelley1
Quote:
And yet, when I or someone else points out those context clues to you and others like you in verses used in this debate about homosexuality and homosexual sex and homosexual marriage, you tell us we're twisting the Bible.

Example response: No, you're twisting what is says! It names those of other countries, not of other religions. It doesn't say, "Don't marry worshipers of Ba'al." Why can't you see you're just twisting scripture to make it say what you want?


I am not. And example would be: God says to only speak English or straight to hell with you. People in china speaks Chinese, people in Puerto Rico speaks Spanish, and people in Africa speaks... African? God tells you not to marry people from that country because of that reason. If you do then you'll start speaking another language and slowly start moving away from the English language, and have children that speaks the other language that is not English.

That is exactly reason behind the text. It's there. It's in red. I didn't say anything other than what was in the red. I didn't add anything extra to from it to make it what I had to say. It's already in the text.


Just like every single thing I've said. It's right there, right in the text. No adding.

The only thing I do is I use a different language for the text. For some reason, you peeps seem to think that makes it cheating, as if God and everyone in the Bible spoke English.

Queen Kelley1
Quote:
Yeah, don't really care. Bible Code and all that other mess can *phbbbt* jog on.

Once again, it doesn't matter. Replace my NIV verses with their KJV equivalents. The arguments still work. Most often because I go back to the original language.

YEAH, whatever.


Now who's being childish?

Go ahead and try it. Look up every verse I quote in the KJV and apply my arguments. I give you my guarantee they'll still work and you'll still hate them.

Queen Kelley1
Quote:
Yes, I think the NIV's better than the KJV, for many reasons. And I, and others, can pull up our own websites to support us. But I didn't say the KJV was unusable. Or that it was "Satan," as you said the NIV was. Which, btw, still no verse on the Jesus = Satan NIV thing from you.

But whether or not the KJV sucks and whether or not the NIV sucks, you can use any translation you darn well please and my arguments continue to hold. Go ahead and try it.
I gave you the two links, go a head and read the entire first link.


Why? If the argument is about homosexuality, why continue this debate about "better Bible"? I personally prefer the NCV over KJV and NIV. Mostly because mine has my name on it.

Queen Kelley1
Quote:
He did not have wool for hair. He was not a sheep. What the crap.

His hair was like wool. It's more of a comparison.That's what I've heard/read. I hope I didn't say it was wool.


You did.

Queen Kelley1
Quote:

And the "choice" thing is my point. You see, you don't choose to be gay. Or straight. So, if sins are only choices, and being gay isn't a choice...
You are you're environment. That's how cultures are reserved for long periods of time, and traditions are kept. If you were raised in an all straight environment that says, "being a homo is forbidden" then you wouldn't be a homo as appose to that. To act and behave like a homo is a matter of choice.


Of course you wouldn't. That's why there's no homosexuals in America, where gays have been killed for being gay, right? And there were no gays in Nazi Germany, when they were rounded up and killed in the Holocaust alongside Jews and blacks and Protestants, right?

Oh, wait... That's stupid.

Homosexuals have existed as long as people have. And have suffered torment for it. Why would they keep being gay if it was a choice and their choice caused them nothing but pain, by your theory? And, again, WTH do you mean by "act and behave" like a homosexual?

And why don't you read MY link, hm? I read two of yours. Least you could do is read mine.
 
     
 
Queen Kelley1
linaloki
Queen Kelley1
http://www.jesus-is-lord.com/nivsatan.htm [Details of NIV and KJV]


Congratulations. You fell for one of the classic blunders.

Lucifer, in the KJV, was left untranslated from the Latin. It is a word that literally means "morning star". It is ALSO a title used by Babylonian royalty of the time. Which is what the verse was talking about.

Lucifer is not Satan. Satan is Satan. Lucifer is an untranslated title for kings.


Even though, can you explain the comparison with Christ?


Christ was King of Kings. Fitting, then, to be compared to the highest of highs in Babylon, especially in their region and with the Jewish history in Babylon.

Queen Kelley1
I'm sure of that.


You can become attracted to whoever you want at a moment's notice? And willingly have sex with them? Whilst sober?

Please attempt this. Record your findings. You'll disprove psychologists and scientists all over the world and make shiny pennies for yourself.
     
Quote:
You can become attracted to whoever you want at a moment's notice? And willingly have sex with them? Whilst sober?

Please attempt this. Record your findings. You'll disprove psychologists and scientists all over the world and make shiny pennies for yourself.


I think most of society has sex with people now even if they aren't attracted....and they are sober.
 
     
 
Isaac488
Quote:
You can become attracted to whoever you want at a moment's notice? And willingly have sex with them? Whilst sober?

Please attempt this. Record your findings. You'll disprove psychologists and scientists all over the world and make shiny pennies for yourself.


I think most of society has sex with people now even if they aren't attracted....and they are sober.


Speaking from a male point of view, attraction helps a great deal. Usually.
     
Fanpersons: 106
Hero Worshipers: 85
People that love me: ...Woahz. +33
PM if you think Loki is awesomeness.

http://r.undev.org/?r=17796
linaloki
Isaac488
Quote:
You can become attracted to whoever you want at a moment's notice? And willingly have sex with them? Whilst sober?

Please attempt this. Record your findings. You'll disprove psychologists and scientists all over the world and make shiny pennies for yourself.


I think most of society has sex with people now even if they aren't attracted....and they are sober.


Speaking from a male point of view, attraction helps a great deal. Usually.


we know how evil women can be, tricking the poor men in to obeying their every need. The strong ones see through it though
 
     
I don't like to ride with crazy women, they don't drive crazy right...
 
I sorely wish I had the time to read through this debate. I want to be able to take part, but I'd rather not repeat arguments that have already been made.
     
'I'm a good jumper,' he said, 'but I'm not so good at landing.' 'Maybe you should stay closer to the ground then,' I said, and he shook his head and said the ground was the whole problem in the first place
Loki, I got a qestion. Does peeps 3ver came heer an ast U "why do you debate a sbujeckative" OP?

Cause osme1 did that thar 2 me. emo I dom't noe wut 2 say back.
 
     




Peek-a-boo! T'is I, Noora! blaugh
 
Our_Friend_Faithful_Ruby
Loki, I got a qestion. Does peeps 3ver came heer an ast U "why do you debate a sbujeckative" OP?

Cause osme1 did that thar 2 me. emo I dom't noe wut 2 say back.


....could you repeat that in English please?
(not trying to be mean, but I like keeping up with the debates here and I had better luck reading the Greek than that)
     
Vashfan1600
Our_Friend_Faithful_Ruby
Loki, I got a qestion. Does peeps 3ver came heer an ast U "why do you debate a sbujeckative" OP?

Cause osme1 did that thar 2 me. emo I dom't noe wut 2 say back.


....could you repeat that in English please?
(not trying to be mean, but I like keeping up with the debates here and I had better luck reading the Greek than that)


καὶ μεθ’ ἡμέρας ἓξ παραλαμβάνει ὁ Ἰησοῦς τὸν Πέτρον καὶ Ἰάκωβον καὶ Ἰωάννην τὸν ἀδελφὸν αὐτοῦ καὶ ἀναφέρει αὐτοὺς εἰς ὄρος ὑψηλὸν κατ’ ἰδίαν

Josephus can smell out lying Senators kvetching in the Forum.
 
     
All of us have mortal bodies, composed of perishable matter, but the soul lives forever: it is a portion of the Deity housed in our bodies
 
linaloki
Queen Kelley1
linaloki
Queen Kelley1
http://www.jesus-is-lord.com/nivsatan.htm [Details of NIV and KJV]


Congratulations. You fell for one of the classic blunders.

Lucifer, in the KJV, was left untranslated from the Latin. It is a word that literally means "morning star". It is ALSO a title used by Babylonian royalty of the time. Which is what the verse was talking about.

Lucifer is not Satan. Satan is Satan. Lucifer is an untranslated title for kings.


Even though, can you explain the comparison with Christ?


Christ was King of Kings. Fitting, then, to be compared to the highest of highs in Babylon, especially in their region and with the Jewish history in Babylon.

Well, in the Latin, "Lucifer" is more literally "light-bearer/bearing" (lucifer, lucifera, luciferum). Used substantively, "Lucifer" is understood to be "morning star". As I've said, the morning star was a fitting image for the King of Babylon, especially as a taunt. Be that as it may, I also think that "light-bearer" is a fitting image for Christ, no? This dual meaning is an alternate explanation for the "comparison".
     
Questing: Peace on Earth
^-^
Flavius Josephus
Vashfan1600
Our_Friend_Faithful_Ruby
Loki, I got a qestion. Does peeps 3ver came heer an ast U "why do you debate a sbujeckative" OP?

Cause osme1 did that thar 2 me. emo I dom't noe wut 2 say back.


....could you repeat that in English please?
(not trying to be mean, but I like keeping up with the debates here and I had better luck reading the Greek than that)


καὶ μεθ’ ἡμέρας ἓξ παραλαμβάνει ὁ Ἰησοῦς τὸν Πέτρον καὶ Ἰάκωβον καὶ Ἰωάννην τὸν ἀδελφὸν αὐτοῦ καὶ ἀναφέρει αὐτοὺς εἰς ὄρος ὑψηλὸν κατ’ ἰδίαν

Josephus can smell out lying Senators kvetching in the Forum.


What point are you trying to make? There's a translator for greek, but not for chat-speak.
 
     
If you see me online, chances are I can respond wherever if I get the notice about a post. If I don't respond, then I've probably passed out at my computer.
 
If the people who stick so adamently to their Bible knew how it was made, how the Bible came to be, we wouldn't have nearly as many "Bible thumpers" as we do these days.
     
Gho the Girl: ED's favourite Litigious t**t.

deadmanjay
For a woman, you sure are smart. Now go make me some doughnuts.




Apparently, Tererun likes me enough to make a thread!
Oh, and my d**k is racist.
Isaac488
linaloki
Isaac488
Quote:
You can become attracted to whoever you want at a moment's notice? And willingly have sex with them? Whilst sober?

Please attempt this. Record your findings. You'll disprove psychologists and scientists all over the world and make shiny pennies for yourself.


I think most of society has sex with people now even if they aren't attracted....and they are sober.


Speaking from a male point of view, attraction helps a great deal. Usually.


we know how evil women can be, tricking the poor men in to obeying their every need. The strong ones see through it though


So true...... 3nodding
 
     
I'm a Bi gaian
Dontations always accepted
Donators thank you heart

Universe is run on Irony. Humans are only special because we're the biggest ironic battery in the universe and thus generate power for the whole damn thing.Quote by ty_ping
 
Isaac488
ty_ping
Isaac488
Dark Paladin X
My older brother is a Christian and he'd probably agree with you. I think you've made a few valid arguments, but you must know there are over hundreds of interpretations of the Bible and other holy books like the Quran. Speaking of which, since blasphemy is an unforgivable sin according to your interpretation, I was wondering if me watching a show featuring an angel bludgeoning a character to death in a near daily basis and then revive him would send me to hell; since in many Christian interpretations, angels suppose to HELP people (unless if you consider the Grim Reaper to be "Angel of Death" wink . Or angels in Christianity are supposed to enforce the word of God.


Angels do a lot of things. There are angels, cherubim, seraphim, archangels etc and they all have their own job that they do.

Dark Paladin X
Although I do admit, Islam and Christianity holds similarities and differences. I do think that Islam doesn't hold anything against homosexuality, both religions do take blasphemy really seriously, and do have the concept of Jesus (although in Islam, they only see Jesus as a prophet instead of being the son of God). Speaking of which, I was wondering if Christians consider Jesus to be the son of God?

I always thought that Islamic people hated homosexuals.
And yeah, Christians believe Jesus is the son of God.


Islam is a little funny on the subject.

On one hand it very blaitently says that sex in general is a weakness and that people can't be trusted with it. It would be great if everyone would stay a virgen forever but we all suck so Allah has to put restrictions on sex or we'd be sticking out willies in EVERYTHING.

Because Allah has to put restrictions on sex, sex is for PROCREATION between TWO MARRIED PEOPLE ONLY
Ever.
Period.

And that's only if you absolutely positively can't keep it in your pants.

Now it does go into details saying that you should pleasure one another and work to do it. That it is a sacred act between to people HOWEVER we just can't be trusted with it not to ******** it up so STAY IN THE RULES.

(Makes sense considering STD's and heartbreak and divorce, Marriage and sex within the Qua'ran are expected to be taken very seriously)
Homosexual sex is directly and compleatly spoken of as against those rule.

However this is where it get's funny.

If a Homosexual is opnely a Homosexual AND a Muslim, and he can stay a Virgen his entire life, He will become a Saint and be permitted to have ALL THE GAY SEX HE WANTS in Heaven.

Basically it boils down to the only reason why Homosexual sex is considered bad is because Allah thinks is bad enough we can't keep a streight couple togeather who is bonded by a child it's just as hard if not harder to keep togeather a homosexual couple who is bonded by nothing but emotions.

Allah's kind of big on commitment.

So really, you could fall in love with a man (if you're a man) or a woman (if you're a woman) and live with them and hug and kiss them and be with them. But you can never (in this life) consumate your relationship.

This is also where the Qua'ran gets funny.

It is a sin to see two people having sex.
So if you secretly watch two people doing it, you're gonna get in s**t yourself.

However, if you want to get someone else in s**t for having GAY sex (The punishment IS death on your second strike) You and FIVE OTHER PEOPLE have to catch them doing it.

neutral

Oh and the Punishment tends to be first time I think a few lashes and a promise to the community to keep it in your pants.
The second time you get a stoning.

So really the Qua'ran is kinda weird on the whole issue of Homosexuals. Granted this ONLY applies to Muslim homosexuals as the Qua'ran specifically states that their laws are not supposed to apply to any other religions. That Allah gave everyone a different set of rules to follow so people are not supposed to pass judgements on other peoples rules.


So you'd get in trouble watching people do it but if the person is gay then it's ok to witness with 5 other people then rat on them?


technically, no.

I also think there is a rule in there about generally "not being a squealer" but I can't say that for certain.

Technically the posse of people that ratted out the gay couple should be getting their comeuppance as well, now their punishment would probably just be some community service, possibly a fine to the Temple or maybe a beating if spying on people was a habit for them, but it's supposed to be severe enough that they're deterred from doing it again, or deterred enough not to rat out the homo's (Unless they REALLY hate them)

But this is all according to the Qua'ran, which is where the real problem sets in, in that the (I'd venture to say) majority of Muslims (much like Christians) are completely unfamiliar with the Qua'ran at all.

Which is terrible since they set aside a 1/2 an hour every day 5 times a day in order to study it and contemplate just as the most basic tenant of their faith.

Allah was right in that people are weak and need the strongest of rules just to make them a little bit better.


(^ I say that and contemplate all those Religious people that when in conversations with Atheists claim that Atheists have no morals because they have no God which I think all those Religious people must secretly be horrible horrible people if the only thing keeping them from raping and murdering is a flimsy belief that some otherworldly sky daddy is watching them and will punish them for it AFTER THEY DIE. Really Atheists if they were Religious must be Saints considering they're the only ones being "Good for Goodnesses sake"
     
Queen Kelley1



Okay, the NIV is total BS. When did the Hebrew bible have anything to do with capstone?
Why does the NIV call satan"christ"?

*facepalm*

Most of what you quoted wasn't from the NIV but from the ORIGINAL GREEK the language that the Bible was FIRST written in.
Quote:

Well, anyways the KJV is the same as the bible 1500 years ago [the Latin version].
which was traslated to English from Latin from Greek.

A problem with translations in general is they don't work.
Period.
At all.
You can't understand the nuances of one language completely in another.

I assume you're an anime fan simply because you're on the internet, so I'll use Japanese as an example.

Suki, Daisuki, and Aishitersu.
All of them mean "love" but they are different degrees of love. If I say "I love you" depending on which one I use it can hold quite a different meaning. However it would be rather annoying if every anime had the footnote on it.
*This love they're talking about is a more friendship based love and not the romantic kind.

Ohiyou gozaimasu really means "The first time we meet today" which, while it is translated as "Good morning" isn't true as people coming to work at night, or in the afternoon still greet everyone "Ohiyou" because it's the first time you meet greeting, not just a morning one.

an even better one that I learnt recently us
Omae no okasan wa debeso.
"Your mother has a Pot-Belly"

((one of the only "Your Mom" jokes in Japan))

However the meaning goes deeper in that, in order for me to know this fact (your mother has a pot belly) implies I slept with your mother. So it can also mean "your mother is a whore" or even "Yea that's what your mom said last night"

Most Japanese people don't even know the history behind that insult.

These are one very basic example in one language very different from English.
So lets also look at German.

Histore and Geshicte (sp??)
Both of these words mean "History" however Historie means "History which can be confirmed by fact" whereas Geshicte means "History which is remembered in legend" So something like the Bible is Geshicte, The Brothers Grimm tales are Geshicte. But the line is even fuzzier then that. The history of say Aristotle, Plato's mentor. We have no proof of his existence beyond the writing of others so while Plato is Historie Aristotle is Geshicte.

So close and yet you wouldn't say "Little red riding hood" should be in a History textbook.

Even the English language has changed so much so people don't recognize it from former times. Thee's and Thous have been replaced by You and They and most people (myself included) don't know the difference, just look at the footnotes in Shakespearean plays, no one in this day and age says "I bite my thumb at thee" nor can we understand what the insult is supposed to be anymore.

Quote:

What ever translation err they had, they should have corrected in the year 500 [Which was probably rewritten from the year 400]. I heard nothing of this satanic NIV.


The bible is a collection of 66 separate books written over a time frame of about 1,600 years by 40 different authors.
The Old testament (a.k.a Hebrew Bible, a.k.a Tanakh) comprises of 39 books written between 1500 BCE and 400BCE
The New testament "novum testamentum", or as the English says it, "New Covenant." contains 27 books written from 40 CE to 90 CE (or later if I'm going to be mean about it since these dates are debated adding and removing decades depending on who is doing the dating)
The OT is written in Ancient Hebrew
The NT is written mostly in Greek with a little Arabic.

In 500 CE the Bible was translated into many languages, however at the same time the Council of Nicea took place which then united the Christians Churches to one, the Roman Catholic Church, also uniting the languages to one language, The Latin Vulgate. by 600 CE there was only one Bible in only one language. Restricting readership of the Bible to priests approved of by the RCC, and all religious interpretations and gospel spreading to them.

Those who translated the scripture into any other language would be punished by death. All other copies of scripture not approved by them were to be destroyed. (Fortunately thanks to the Dead Sea Scrolls many missing scriptures and other translations of the same scriptures in their pre 500CE state have been found. Giving us fresh translations of once muddled work.)

After 600CE priests were able to rule the religious (and thus governmental and privet) lives of people without question. A priest in a town or village literally held a man or woman's afterlife in his hands, because, not only was he the only legal religion, he was the only one who understood it.

Because of this any priest could teach any doctrine without scriptural foundation (Hence the reason why many people believe Mary Magdaline was the Adulteress mentioned in the New Testament, however she had nothing to do with that as the Adulteress was unnamed and Mary came before. Officially this has been retracted but her name is forever sullied by this false doctrine.)

This forced ignorance went on from 500 CE to around 1500CE.

Around 1500 CE one John Wyclif believed people should be able to read the Bible in their own language, later scholars such as Thomas Linacre and John Colet when looking at the Latin bible saw it had become so corrupt it hardly resembled the original texts at all. This was also followed quite closely by Martin Luther and his 48 thesis against the method in which the Roman Catholics taught.

In 1611 the King James Bible was created on commission by King James 1 of England.

It was translated by 40-50 scholars who had nothing to do with the church.
BUT the group was directed by a Committee of Roman Catholic Church Bishops and had to gain their approval on any traslation they did, therefor they made the command that any translations the scholars made could not go against any pre dictated commandments of the church
(So even if the Bible said "Homosexuality is Okay here's a story about a big happy gay couple" the RCC wouldn't have let them put it in.)
If the scholars had anything they were unsure of, they to follow what the RCC had previously said about that verse instead of looking for their own translation. King James himself placed rules upon their translations as well, further stating that they had to keep things within the currently established status quo. (So if the bible said "Down with the King" they couldn't traslate that either.)

The KJV Bible is found by most scholars to be the MOST unreliable and erroneous if not outright incorrect Bible Version to date.

The Issue with many Bibles following is that very few scholars bother to look into the hermeneutics of the text past what other scholars already believe.

Quote:
Also, we do not know 100% even 70% that god allowed homo activities, let's not risk it.

Based on that reasoning...
Well we don't know 100% if God wants us to eat certain foods so I hope you're asking forgiveness for ever shrimp and peice of pork you've ever eaten
Well we done know 100% if God allows computers. QUICK GET OFF THE DEVIL MACHINE.

If the Bible doesn't say, or we don't know, then if falls under Christian liberty and we judge it based on how Jesus taught us how to judge teachings.

In Matt 7 Jesus tells us to judge a Teacher (or Prophet) by his/her "Fruit" saying that no good fruit can come from a bad tree and no bad fruit can come from a good tree.

What "Fruit" has the prophecy that homosexuality is a sin brought?
Death, either the killing of homosexuals, the ignorance leading to the spread of disease amongst them or those driven to suicide under the belief that they are detestable creatures by their nature.
Fear and Hate, Bigotry, Lies and Slander, Families breaking apart and Friendships lost forever.
And most importantly, an abandonment of God.
Because Homosexuals feel that their very desire is detestable due to these false teachings many of them and other Christians have abandoned God rather than believe that they'd be condemned by feeling love for someone who is coincidentally their own sex.

What "Fruit" has the prophecy that homosexuality is not a sin brought?
It has kept people alive, it has given them rights and awareness.
It has brought Families back together and kept friendships going. It's resulting in Loving Caring couples and Joyous Happy Homes. It has created Understanding and Peace.

And most importantly again. It has reconnected people with God and prevented further sinning and hate from spreading.
I personally know a few Homosexuals whom I have spoken with on this topic whom had given up on the Love of God until after they realized that it was simply the hate of man being pushed on them. Friends of Homosexuals who have been eased in their abject fear that their friends were going to hell simply because of whom they loved.

When you see a girl break down distraught because her best friend is "Going to hell" you can really see the fruit of that false prophecy.

Quote:
BTW the 10 commandment is what he expect of us.


And "Thou shalt not be a part of this faggotry" was not one of those commandments.

And Jesus broke some of them himself and encouraged the breaking of them.
 
     

This is me caring about what you say...
Really... 4 REALZ!

Quick Reply

Enter both words below, separated by a space:

Can't read the text? Click here

Submit

We will be phasing out support for your browser soon.

Please upgrade to one of these more modern browsers.