Welcome to Gaia's forums, where millions of members gather to discuss random stuff, make new friends,
complain about life, argue about nothing, laugh at dumb pictures, discuss serious issues and/or curse like sailors.
Lurking is creepy. Quit skulking in the shadows and join the conversation!
Register to reply
 |
Lsuboymatt Her is one thing: It says man and a woman not man and man or woman and woman but MAN AND WOmAN to be together! Hermaphrodites. |
|
|
Lsuboymatt Here is one thing: It says man and a woman, not man and man or woman and woman, but MAN AND WOmMAN to be together! No one ever quotes the right post... Or part of the post... Sigh. So, because it never says man+man is okay, or woman+woman is okay, those are wrong? Or are you saying the Bible says that man+man is wrong, and that woman+woman is wrong? |
 |
|
|
ty_ping Lsuboymatt Her is one thing: It says man and a woman not man and man or woman and woman but MAN AND WOmAN to be together! Hermaphrodites. And I agree - the idea that marriage should be composed of one male person and one female person completely ignores everyone who does not fall neatly into one of those categories, including intersexed people and in some cases, transgendered people. I've heard of cases in certain states were not allowed to get married to someone of the opposite gender, because the judge ruled that although they'd had gender reassignment and had their legal gender changed, they could not change their DNA and thus would not be recognized as their new legal gender for the purpose of marriage. This is really screwed up, because the vast majority of people have never had their karyotype checked, and thus do not know if their DNA is XX or XY. And while you might assume that all female-appearing babies are XX and all male-appearing ones are XY, this isn't true - about 1 in 20,000 male-assigned babies has something other than XY (and they usually don't find this out until they get married and have trouble conceiving.) There are women with androgen insensitivity who appear completely female at birth and as adults, and they too usually don't find out that they have XY chromasomes and internally male reproductive organs until they repeatedly fail to conceive. In both cases, these XY women are still women, and the XX men are still men. What this tells me is that gender is not determined by your DNA, but by how you identify yourself. |
|
|
ty_ping Lsuboymatt Her is one thing: It says man and a woman not man and man or woman and woman but MAN AND WOmAN to be together! Hermaphrodites. Let's not confuse the poor child. Monosyllabic words only, I think. |
|
|
|
MercuryChaos ty_ping Lsuboymatt Her is one thing: It says man and a woman not man and man or woman and woman but MAN AND WOmAN to be together! Hermaphrodites. Quote: And I agree - the idea that marriage should be composed of one male person and one female person completely ignores everyone who does not fall neatly into one of those categories, including intersexed people and in some cases, transgendered people. I've heard of cases in certain states were not allowed to get married to someone of the opposite gender, because the judge ruled that although they'd had gender reassignment and had their legal gender changed, they could not change their DNA and thus would not be recognized as their new legal gender for the purpose of marriage. This is really screwed up, because the vast majority of people have never had their karyotype checked, and thus do not know if their DNA is XX or XY. And while you might assume that all female-appearing babies are XX and all male-appearing ones are XY, this isn't true - about 1 in 20,000 male-assigned babies has something other than XY (and they usually don't find this out until they get married and have trouble conceiving.) There are women with androgen insensitivity who appear completely female at birth and as adults, and they too usually don't find out that they have XY chromasomes and internally male reproductive organs until they repeatedly fail to conceive. In both cases, these XY women are still women, and the XX men are still men. What this tells me is that gender is not determined by your DNA, but by how you identify yourself. QFT |
|
|
Someone needs to remind me to put Galatians 2/3 in the OP when discussing why Leviticus is not binding to Christians. I'd do it now, but is lunch time.
|
|
|
|
I was looking around online and I found this
http://www.kansascity.com/440/story/1272761.html "Homosexual Demon" being cast out of a 16 year old. What I don't get is that I wasn't aware that demons even had a gender, let alone have a sexual orientation. |
|
|
I think someone should be able to love whomever they want.
Race or gender should not matter. We should not force our beliefs onto someone else to change their preference. |
|
|
|
Isaac488 I was looking around online and I found this http://www.kansascity.com/440/story/1272761.html "Homosexual Demon" being cast out of a 16 year old. What I don't get is that I wasn't aware that demons even had a gender, let alone have a sexual orientation. Clearly, you haven't read Jack Chick's works. |
|
|
linaloki Isaac488 I was looking around online and I found this http://www.kansascity.com/440/story/1272761.html "Homosexual Demon" being cast out of a 16 year old. What I don't get is that I wasn't aware that demons even had a gender, let alone have a sexual orientation. Clearly, you haven't read Jack Chick's works. Is this for real or some satirical parody thing? |
|
|
|
Isaac488 linaloki Isaac488 I was looking around online and I found this http://www.kansascity.com/440/story/1272761.html "Homosexual Demon" being cast out of a 16 year old. What I don't get is that I wasn't aware that demons even had a gender, let alone have a sexual orientation. Clearly, you haven't read Jack Chick's works. Is this for real or some satirical parody thing? Jack Chick is 100% completely serious and an embarrassment to Christ. |
|
|
Love all, trust a few. And I suppose that it's meant to be distributed to children.... Sickening. Sorry--thread stalker reaction. I think what you're doing here is wonderful, by the way. You guys are awesome; keep up the good work. Do wrong to none. |
|
|
|
I have to say, this is quite impressive. Thank you for pointing out things that even I, a homosexual, could never have pointed out. Here is what I have to say. Being a homosexual gives me no extra or less rights as those that are heterosexual. Who is to define love anyway? I am not just sexual attracted to my lover, but I am emotionally attatched also. Comprehend the fact that I, we, are people, just likes yourselves. I can marry whom I want, like the post said, marriage is not a christian right. What the bible says: blahblhablah. There are 19 major religions out in this world and about 2200 different forms of each major religion, broken down to minor religions. For example; Lutherine, Pennicostal, Methodist, ect.. No one person should be able to say that their religion is the only way to go. Like the bible says, "Judge not, les ye be judged." Telling one that they cannot get married is a form of judgement that they cannot. I am not religious, but there are many gays that are, though, I love all. Except Dolly Parton. Her boobs scare me. ; o ; Lmao~ jkjk~ |
|
|
well u conviced me that gays r ok and it didnt take long i cant make it threw its long as hell its like reading a long boring capter book
|
|
|
Estimated Value:
|
linaloki Isaac488 linaloki Isaac488 I was looking around online and I found this http://www.kansascity.com/440/story/1272761.html "Homosexual Demon" being cast out of a 16 year old. What I don't get is that I wasn't aware that demons even had a gender, let alone have a sexual orientation. Clearly, you haven't read Jack Chick's works. Is this for real or some satirical parody thing? Jack Chick is 100% completely serious and an embarrassment to Christ. Sometimes, sometimes I like to think that he is being satirical. Simply because I refuse to believe anyone is that big of an a**. And the world just keeps trying to prove me wrong. |
|
