Homosexuality Is NOT A Sin: What Christ Said And More

[Cyphusiel]

linaloki

Zoreta

What needs to be separated is god condemning homosexuality and god condemning homosexual activity. He speakes against homosexual sex- but there is nothing against homosexuality itself.

God only spoke against homosexual male sexual activity. And that no longer applies, either.

Zoreta

The main thing here is the loop hole. The bible condemns sex outside marriage. However, homosexuals aren't allowed to marry- therefore, they can not have sex. The latter is based on the former- a classic loophole.

They cannot have sex without sinning, yes. The answer to this is to let them marry.

Yes so they can still sin but be married

[No No Raja]

Cyphusiel

linaloki

Zoreta

What needs to be separated is god condemning homosexuality and god condemning homosexual activity. He speakes against homosexual sex- but there is nothing against homosexuality itself.

God only spoke against homosexual male sexual activity. And that no longer applies, either.

Zoreta

The main thing here is the loop hole. The bible condemns sex outside marriage. However, homosexuals aren't allowed to marry- therefore, they can not have sex. The latter is based on the former- a classic loophole.

They cannot have sex without sinning, yes. The answer to this is to let them marry.

Yes so they can still sin but be married

Oh, will you SHUT UP?

What sanctity does it have now, anyway? With the divorce rates as they are and streets abound with whorehouses, love affairs, what have you, who are you to damn two people who LOVE each other and want to bind each other together, both as an expression of their love and an attempt to get a leg-up on the new life they're trying to start together?

You've given no good reasons as to WHY they SHOULDN'T be married that isn't based on fallacious reasoning. So why don't you clam up already and let us live our lives?

[] .The. [ Dark ] .One. []

heart heart heart

heart

Uhm.
His response was relevant to Loki's words.
It would seem to some as he said due to how Loki wrote it.

heart

heart heart heart

[SinfulGuillotine]

] .The. [ Dark ] .One. [

heart heart heart

heart

Uhm.
His response was relevant to Loki's words.
It would seem to some as he said due to how Loki wrote it.

heart

heart heart heart

Doesn't mean other people can't respond to it.

[SinfulGuillotine]

Saltski Circe

Cyphusiel

linaloki

Zoreta

What needs to be separated is god condemning homosexuality and god condemning homosexual activity. He speakes against homosexual sex- but there is nothing against homosexuality itself.

God only spoke against homosexual male sexual activity. And that no longer applies, either.

Zoreta

The main thing here is the loop hole. The bible condemns sex outside marriage. However, homosexuals aren't allowed to marry- therefore, they can not have sex. The latter is based on the former- a classic loophole.

They cannot have sex without sinning, yes. The answer to this is to let them marry.

Yes so they can still sin but be married

Oh, will you SHUT UP?

What sanctity does it have now, anyway? With the divorce rates as they are and streets abound with whorehouses, love affairs, what have you, who are you to damn two people who LOVE each other and want to bind each other together, both as an expression of their love and an attempt to get a leg-up on the new life they're trying to start together?

You've given no good reasons as to WHY they SHOULDN'T be married that isn't based on fallacious reasoning. So why don't you clam up already and let us live our lives?

You obviously don't understand the appeal of posting idiotic one-liners that serve absolutely no purpose.

Apparently, in Cyphusiel's world, it's all the rage.

[Cyphusiel]

Saltski Circe

Cyphusiel

linaloki

Zoreta

What needs to be separated is god condemning homosexuality and god condemning homosexual activity. He speakes against homosexual sex- but there is nothing against homosexuality itself.

God only spoke against homosexual male sexual activity. And that no longer applies, either.

Zoreta

The main thing here is the loop hole. The bible condemns sex outside marriage. However, homosexuals aren't allowed to marry- therefore, they can not have sex. The latter is based on the former- a classic loophole.

They cannot have sex without sinning, yes. The answer to this is to let them marry.

Yes so they can still sin but be married

Oh, will you SHUT UP?

What sanctity does it have now, anyway? With the divorce rates as they are and streets abound with whorehouses, love affairs, what have you, who are you to damn two people who LOVE each other and want to bind each other together, both as an expression of their love and an attempt to get a leg-up on the new life they're trying to start together?

You've given no good reasons as to WHY they SHOULDN'T be married that isn't based on fallacious reasoning. So why don't you clam up already and let us live our lives?

Marriage has been between a man and a woman call it personal partnerships for all I care, oh and good fallicious bit about love having to be a precursor to marriage

[Cyphusiel]

SinfulGuillotine

Saltski Circe

Cyphusiel

linaloki

Zoreta

What needs to be separated is god condemning homosexuality and god condemning homosexual activity. He speakes against homosexual sex- but there is nothing against homosexuality itself.

God only spoke against homosexual male sexual activity. And that no longer applies, either.

Zoreta

The main thing here is the loop hole. The bible condemns sex outside marriage. However, homosexuals aren't allowed to marry- therefore, they can not have sex. The latter is based on the former- a classic loophole.

They cannot have sex without sinning, yes. The answer to this is to let them marry.

Yes so they can still sin but be married

Oh, will you SHUT UP?

What sanctity does it have now, anyway? With the divorce rates as they are and streets abound with whorehouses, love affairs, what have you, who are you to damn two people who LOVE each other and want to bind each other together, both as an expression of their love and an attempt to get a leg-up on the new life they're trying to start together?

You've given no good reasons as to WHY they SHOULDN'T be married that isn't based on fallacious reasoning. So why don't you clam up already and let us live our lives?

You obviously don't understand the appeal of posting idiotic one-liners that serve absolutely no purpose.

Apparently, in Cyphusiel's world, it's all the rage.

As is rainbow connections practice to give each other high fives which does nothing to contribute to the discussion at hand but those do not get deleted, hrm wonder why

[SinfulGuillotine]

Cyphusiel

As is rainbow connections practice to give each other high fives which does nothing to contribute to the discussion at hand but those do not get deleted, hrm wonder why

Perhaps it's because such people actually do contribute and make worthwhile arguments inbetween the trivialities.

I don't think I've ever seen you make any sort of contribution. Unless you count arguing over the semantics of "gay marriage" or using the oldest and most shot-down trick in the book against same-sex marriage ("Marriage has always been between a man and a woman." wink

Oh, and randomly PMing me demanding to know about my religious practises.

Honestly, why do you bother? Do you just get off on being a thorn in everyone's side?

[Cyphusiel]

SinfulGuillotine

Cyphusiel

As is rainbow connections practice to give each other high fives which does nothing to contribute to the discussion at hand but those do not get deleted, hrm wonder why

Perhaps it's because such people actually do contribute and make worthwhile arguments inbetween the trivialities.

I don't think I've ever seen you make any sort of contribution. Unless you count arguing over the semantics of "gay marriage" or using the oldest and most shot-down trick in the book against same-sex marriage ("Marriage has always been between a man and a woman." wink

Oh, and randomly PMing me demanding to know about my religious practises.

Honestly, why do you bother? Do you just get off on being a thorn in everyone's side?

I didn't know I demanding entailed clarification. Why do people bother posting in here?

[No No Raja]

Cyphusiel

Marriage has been between a man and a woman

Appeal to tradition and inevitability. Invalid.

Cyphusiel

call it personal partnerships for all I care,

Oh, that's RIGHT!!! Because apparently "separate but equal" WASN'T deemed unconstitutional!

Cyphusiel

oh and good fallicious bit about love having to be a precursor to marriage

Way to miss my point.

Heterosexual immorality is rampant and in some cases legal. Mind telling me what's so virtuous about that, and how that's somehow better than a dedicated companionship, REGARDLESS of gender?

[SinfulGuillotine]

Cyphusiel

SinfulGuillotine

Cyphusiel

As is rainbow connections practice to give each other high fives which does nothing to contribute to the discussion at hand but those do not get deleted, hrm wonder why

Perhaps it's because such people actually do contribute and make worthwhile arguments inbetween the trivialities.

I don't think I've ever seen you make any sort of contribution. Unless you count arguing over the semantics of "gay marriage" or using the oldest and most shot-down trick in the book against same-sex marriage ("Marriage has always been between a man and a woman." wink

Oh, and randomly PMing me demanding to know about my religious practises.

Honestly, why do you bother? Do you just get off on being a thorn in everyone's side?

I didn't know I demanding entailed clarification. Why do people bother posting in here?

Rephrase that in English that can be understood by the general public?

[Cyphusiel]

Saltski Circe

Cyphusiel

Marriage has been between a man and a woman

Appeal to tradition and inevitability. Invalid.

Cyphusiel

call it personal partnerships for all I care,

Oh, that's RIGHT!!! Because apparently "separate but equal" WASN'T deemed unconstitutional!

Cyphusiel

oh and good fallicious bit about love having to be a precursor to marriage

Way to miss my point.

Heterosexual immorality is rampant and in some cases legal. Mind telling me what's so virtuous about that, and how that's somehow better than a dedicated companionship, REGARDLESS of gender?

people can have children with someone they love?

[No No Raja]

Cyphusiel

people can have children with someone they love?

Guess what, gays can do that too!

Ever hear of in vitro fertilization? Surrogate parenting?

ADOPTION!?

After all, you know, I have to agree, god forbid those older, minority, and special needs kids get ignored while all the hot white fetii are snatched up before they're even born.

[Cyphusiel]

Saltski Circe

Cyphusiel

people can have children with someone they love?

Guess what, gays can do that too!

Ever hear of in vitro fertilization? Surrogate parenting?

ADOPTION!?

After all, you know, I have to agree, god forbid those older, minority, and special needs kids get ignored while all the hot white fetii are snatched up before they're even born.

I was not aware members of the same sex could pro create with one another

[[. Balthier .]]

Cyphusiel

Saltski Circe

Cyphusiel

people can have children with someone they love?

Guess what, gays can do that too!

Ever hear of in vitro fertilization? Surrogate parenting?

ADOPTION!?

After all, you know, I have to agree, god forbid those older, minority, and special needs kids get ignored while all the hot white fetii are snatched up before they're even born.

I was not aware members of the same sex could pro create with one another

Does it somehow matter if they can't?