EtherealEyes
Offline
Post: 4709760_61 created on Fri Nov 26, 2004 2:02 pmPosted: Fri Nov 26, 2004 2:02 pm
![]() |
I do not believe that there is any point that exists that has not been properly presented in your first post. Nice job. I also believe that every one of the opposing arguments that you stated in the first post (against homosexuality) have been completely disregarded because of your points.
Some things that i would like to add... Claiming that living in a homosexual environment will screw up the children, is already a waste of speech because the entire point of this thread is trying to prove what is so wrong with homosexuality...there is nothing wrong, therefore a child cannot be screwed up because there is nothing wrong with homosexuality. The only reason these children may be "screwed" up is because of the children with straight kids who choose to make the childs life a living hell, like you stated earlier. The religious argument you make is also very valid. A persons sexual preferences are no ones business but their own, there is nothing wrong with it...however the "bible" says its wrong. Some book written by some people thousands of years ago claim that its wrong because of what their "God" says. So automatically, it HAS to be wrong...oh no.. The bible says its wrong...the bible also says the world was created in six days. The bible also says the sun revolves around the earth....however we show no credibility to these false statements. The bible is not a valid argument against homosexuality, because not everyone believes in the bullshit the bible says. for the not procreating point, i must hand it to you, you really shut those assholes up. Just because people cannot procreate, they shouldnt get married? What kind of bullshit is this? I swear that some people with STDs choose not to procreate because it will make their child suffer, and i also believe that paralyzed people can still get married, even though they cannot procreate through sex. So, Christopher Reed couldnt procreate, cuz he couldnt...er, he couldnt exactly impregnate someone. Does that mean that infertile women or men do not have the right to get married? Stupid idiots... Every point you expressed is completely right, there is no way you can possibly argue against those points. |
|






















