Welcome to Gaia! ::

pockybot
Believe it or not I actually often find a lot of the conservative Christian midwest/southerner types liberals hate to be more down to earth and friendly than the smarmy yuppy types. Sure they may vote for rich conservatives, but they tend to have less money to work with and seem more HUMBLE.

They do tend to have less money and be working class, but yet they vote for capitalist class politicians and policies. Hmmm, Marx's theory of false consciousness, anyone? wink

Quote:
Even the Occupy kids seem to be complaining about first world big city probems(omg, my Latte wasnt made right...my laptop doesnt get wi fi in here)

I have not seen this at all. The Occupy people have been very nice, down-to-earth and almost borderline hippie many of them. Have you experienced Occupy protestors like this?
Das Mannlein
Nonesuch Solo
Das Mannlein


Well, I'm sorry my point about the general effect it has on American jobs has offended you based on your experience as an individual. Any store that is open in America and offers jobs to people in that store obviously contributes jobs to America (that town specifically), but my point is that the manufacturing of the goods occurs almost exclusively in countries such as China and Pakistan. Now, goods made in America cost more, because you have to pay the workers more, which is why Walmart (and other discount stores like it) don't sell those items. It create an unfortunate loop where they outsource to other countries to get cheaper products (then more people can buy them) but in the long run, it cuts jobs for American workers.

"Hmm", indeed. It's very upsetting that a lot of people are forced to shop at places like Walmart because they don't make enough to cover the costs of goods made in this country, or goods made with a higher quality. Does that make my statement (that Walmart takes jobs from potential American workers) incorrect? No.

It's also where the link the OP made (between the lower classes and a tendency of being overweight) is suspected to come from - lower-quality, pre-packaged food that lasts for a long time due to preservatives tends to be more fattening than fresher food that is more expensive and more perishable. However, people who subsist on foodstamps often do most of their shopping all at once and so they need cheap food that lasts (it is my understanding that with the "high" price of gas in this country that it's generally best to make very few trips anywhere by car).

I'm not saying that physical Walmart stores don't employ people who live here, but I AM saying that the business practice of outsourcing jobs is probably contributing to the huge difference in economic classes/people living below the poverty line.


Bringing manufacturing back to American soil would not help my local community, either, unless paired with a complete overhaul of the educational system. While industry does drive educational policies to some extent, I think the infrastructure needs to be here before it will be in any way profitable for companies to bring manufacturing back.

There is a disturbing lack of interest in working a manufacturing job, not just in rural communities but in the United States as a whole. We want to imagine our children growing up to be doctors or lawyers or politicians or finding their place in other high-profile, highly desirable but not necessarily hiring markets, so we put them through school with that intent. We in America are waging a war against jobs, specifically those of the "working class." We're churning out a bunch of college graduates who would be overqualified for a manufacturing job (and then face the problem of finding a job in their desired field), while at the same time letting people slip through the cracks in the educational system once they realize they'll never make it to the top. We probably need to stop forcing everyone to aim for the stars, and set more realistic goals throughout schooling so that we can have the workforce needed to manufacture all this cheap bullshit in our own country.

I mean, would you take a job in manufacturing? Not managing a plant, or overseeing any part of the production line, but actually working on the floor? How many people do you know who would do such a thing unless it was their very last option--not just because they're overqualified but because we've built up this lack of respect for those types of jobs?

Actually, until very recently (last month) I worked for minimum wage, and then 50 cents more than that, at a fast food restaurant. I would most certainly consider taking a job in a manufacturing plant assuming such a job was physically safe. I'm not priveleged enough to BE a "churned-out college grad", even.

I'm not sure you're really meaning to argue with ME, so much as you're just upset at the way of the world and my particular comment about Walmart taking away American jobs set you off. Obviously it's upsetting that most people are ashamed to take "menial" or labor-based jobs. I myself constantly get asked when I'm going back to school by relatives and acquaintances, something which isn't an option for me at the moment because of my low income and several other irrelevant (to this conversation) factors.

I completely agree with you that we should stop telling people that if they're anything short of a doctorate degree and 70k/year, then they've wasted their lives. Sometimes people even WANT to have a "job", not a "career" per se, and they're made to feedl as though they should be ashamed of this. In reality, however, we NEED janitors, we NEED garbage men, and we NEED people to work in manufacturing plants.

Really, the fact that I was lamenting that Walmart outsources for its goods kinda pointed to me feeling that way. : ) It's nice to know you agree with me and that you're clearly passionate about it, but you don't need to take your anger over this out on me. You're not proving anything by trying to get me to admit that I'd be ashamed to take a labor-intensive job, when I'm actually quite content working just that.


I'm more amused because it runs the same line of logic that immigrants are "stealing jobs from Americans"--really, how many unemployed Americans want to do the kinds of things migrant workers tend to do?

Reality hit me pretty hard about seven years ago. I had been one of those privileged folks; my parents were able to [take out loans and] send me to a very prestigious, and very expensive, engineering school in Terre Haute. When I fell ill and had to drop out of school, everybody I knew inadvertently made me feel like complete s**t. I had to go back to living with my parents for several years trying to get my health under control, and meanwhile I worked several minimum- to $2-above-minimum-wage jobs for more than 40 hours per week. My social climate changed overnight. All the people who knew me as I was growing up and had watched my parents proudly pack me off to RHIT would start conversations with "So how many more years until you're officially a mechanical and optical engineer?" and I would end them with "Um, well. I had to drop out because I got sick. Now I work retail, childcare, catering...anything that'll have me." It was very isolating and very lonely.

And I still don't think I'd have gone out and picked beans, or been mad that I couldn't go pick beans because the companies had hired a bunch of potentially undocumented immigrants. xD
Das Mannlein's avatar
  • 200
  • 200
  • 100
Nonesuch Solo
Das Mannlein

Bringing manufacturing back to American soil would not help my local community, either, unless paired with a complete overhaul of the educational system. While industry does drive educational policies to some extent, I think the infrastructure needs to be here before it will be in any way profitable for companies to bring manufacturing back.

There is a disturbing lack of interest in working a manufacturing job, not just in rural communities but in the United States as a whole. We want to imagine our children growing up to be doctors or lawyers or politicians or finding their place in other high-profile, highly desirable but not necessarily hiring markets, so we put them through school with that intent. We in America are waging a war against jobs, specifically those of the "working class." We're churning out a bunch of college graduates who would be overqualified for a manufacturing job (and then face the problem of finding a job in their desired field), while at the same time letting people slip through the cracks in the educational system once they realize they'll never make it to the top. We probably need to stop forcing everyone to aim for the stars, and set more realistic goals throughout schooling so that we can have the workforce needed to manufacture all this cheap bullshit in our own country.

I mean, would you take a job in manufacturing? Not managing a plant, or overseeing any part of the production line, but actually working on the floor? How many people do you know who would do such a thing unless it was their very last option--not just because they're overqualified but because we've built up this lack of respect for those types of jobs?

Actually, until very recently (last month) I worked for minimum wage, and then 50 cents more than that, at a fast food restaurant. I would most certainly consider taking a job in a manufacturing plant assuming such a job was physically safe. I'm not priveleged enough to BE a "churned-out college grad", even.

I'm not sure you're really meaning to argue with ME, so much as you're just upset at the way of the world and my particular comment about Walmart taking away American jobs set you off. Obviously it's upsetting that most people are ashamed to take "menial" or labor-based jobs. I myself constantly get asked when I'm going back to school by relatives and acquaintances, something which isn't an option for me at the moment because of my low income and several other irrelevant (to this conversation) factors.

I completely agree with you that we should stop telling people that if they're anything short of a doctorate degree and 70k/year, then they've wasted their lives. Sometimes people even WANT to have a "job", not a "career" per se, and they're made to feedl as though they should be ashamed of this. In reality, however, we NEED janitors, we NEED garbage men, and we NEED people to work in manufacturing plants.

Really, the fact that I was lamenting that Walmart outsources for its goods kinda pointed to me feeling that way. : ) It's nice to know you agree with me and that you're clearly passionate about it, but you don't need to take your anger over this out on me. You're not proving anything by trying to get me to admit that I'd be ashamed to take a labor-intensive job, when I'm actually quite content working just that.


I'm more amused because it runs the same line of logic that immigrants are "stealing jobs from Americans"--really, how many unemployed Americans want to do the kinds of things migrant workers tend to do?

Reality hit me pretty hard about seven years ago. I had been one of those privileged folks; my parents were able to [take out loans and] send me to a very prestigious, and very expensive, engineering school in Terre Haute. When I fell ill and had to drop out of school, everybody I knew inadvertently made me feel like complete s**t. I had to go back to living with my parents for several years trying to get my health under control, and meanwhile I worked several minimum- to $2-above-minimum-wage jobs for more than 40 hours per week. My social climate changed overnight. All the people who knew me as I was growing up and had watched my parents proudly pack me off to RHIT would start conversations with "So how many more years until you're officially a mechanical and optical engineer?" and I would end them with "Um, well. I had to drop out because I got sick. Now I work retail, childcare, catering...anything that'll have me." It was very isolating and very lonely.

And I still don't think I'd have gone out and picked beans, or been mad that I couldn't go pick beans because the companies had hired a bunch of potentially undocumented immigrants. xD
Actually, that's nothing at all like complaining about illegal immigrants. These are completely seperate issues, and I actually never said I HAD a problem with immigrants supposedly stealing jobs from Americans.

You're clearly making all of these assumptions based on what you're telling me right now about your personal life - that people have acted negatively to you based on you not having a very high-paying or powerful job. You didn't know where I stood on that issue, and it seems that learning that hasn't changed your viewpoint of just shutting down arguments against the specific corporation of Walmart. Not "any place that employs people cheaply because I hate poor people", mind you, but very specifically Walmart, because it's not a very positive force.

Again, illegal immigration is completely different than a company buying goods manufactured in other countries. Ignoring the fact that part of the argument against illegal immigrants is that, due to a lack of proper paperwork, they don't pay taxes when they hold jobs here, it's just completely unrelated to what we were talking about. Or, what I was talking about. (Since clearly we're not quite on the same page.)

All of that said, I think you'd really like this article, then, mainly the first point. The author really articulates some of my own feelings about what's wrong with this generation's viewpoint on jobs.
Nah man we're more connected now than ever.

We just need to improve our current position and get better.


You think this becuase due to the internet you have more exposure than you used to in the 1980's.

You thought the world was in a tiny bubble with little problems and now you're branching out.


Every psycho or over zealous person you see you jump at like it's the first time you've seen something crazy (the irony being you're pretty zealous and out there yourself).

The fact of the matter is, you're merely broadening your horizons which is why it look that way- the dissenting opinion is EVERYWHERE compared to what it used to be (nothing, sense you wouldn't associate yourself with said people before).


But also if you look hard enough you can find the same opinions and really, the average person is still the same as they ever were for the past while now.

More bad opinions exist and are exploded upon in the media, but I don't think it represents the whole. It's just exposure to the absolute extremes and isn't a significant portion of the population like people would like to believe. Many people make assumptions themselves assuming all republicans support their candidate 100% or even democrats the other way around, when they don't, and it's fairly obvious. It's not as cut and dry as everyone makes it out to be and the presidential candidate being of only one of two origins exacerbates the fear.


But I can assure you that people are still as they are and have been sense pretty much always.

Generally moderate with mild inclinations one way or the other. We got extremists (possibly me included), even if it's just on some issues, but over-all every one is just pretty moderate and mild and hoping for the best solution, I mean like anyone else.
Olya
First of all, prices at Target and Walmart are not the same. There is about $1-$5 difference in price and some things are cheaper at Walmart while others are cheaper at Target.

Second, every retailer must position itself in a unique manner in order to compete successfully. There is absolutely no sense in having two stores that sell exact same s**t for exactly the same price to exactly the same consumer.

Third, there has always been a difference in lifestyle of varying demographics. It is not a uniquely American phenomenon and it is not a new concept that sprung up in the 21st century. I have yet to find any compelling evidence for the benefit of a homogeneous society.

gaia_angelleft gaia_star gaia_angelright


Well exactly. Consumer america is split into the have nots, and the have nots who think they are the haves but are still have nots. That's where Target comes in smile For the people who want to think they're a few pegs above the Jerry Springer clientelle of Wally-mart
Meroko_Love
pockybot
Believe it or not I actually often find a lot of the conservative Christian midwest/southerner types liberals hate to be more down to earth and friendly than the smarmy yuppy types. Sure they may vote for rich conservatives, but they tend to have less money to work with and seem more HUMBLE.

They do tend to have less money and be working class, but yet they vote for capitalist class politicians and policies. Hmmm, Marx's theory of false consciousness, anyone? wink

Quote:
Even the Occupy kids seem to be complaining about first world big city probems(omg, my Latte wasnt made right...my laptop doesnt get wi fi in here)

I have not seen this at all. The Occupy people have been very nice, down-to-earth and almost borderline hippie many of them. Have you experienced Occupy protestors like this?



1. Yeah it's a riot...poor white midwestern and southerners voting for fake smile wall street puppets like Bush. Gosh bless em smile

2. I'm in California. I found most the Occupy movement pointless and annoying...and I'm about as leftist as it gets
Olya's avatar
  • 100
  • 150
  • 150
And for the haves, there's Macy's, Bed Bath and Beyond, and Khol's where you can buy the same s**t for two to three times the price.

gaia_angelleft gaia_star gaia_angelright



pockybot
Olya
First of all, prices at Target and Walmart are not the same. There is about $1-$5 difference in price and some things are cheaper at Walmart while others are cheaper at Target.

Second, every retailer must position itself in a unique manner in order to compete successfully. There is absolutely no sense in having two stores that sell exact same s**t for exactly the same price to exactly the same consumer.

Third, there has always been a difference in lifestyle of varying demographics. It is not a uniquely American phenomenon and it is not a new concept that sprung up in the 21st century. I have yet to find any compelling evidence for the benefit of a homogeneous society.

gaia_angelleft gaia_star gaia_angelright


Well exactly. Consumer america is split into the have nots, and the have nots who think they are the haves but are still have nots. That's where Target comes in smile For the people who want to think they're a few pegs above the Jerry Springer clientelle of Wally-mart
Shoulda gone to Ross.

Olya
And for the haves, there's Macy's, Bed Bath and Beyond, and Khol's where you can buy the same s**t for two to three times the price.

gaia_angelleft gaia_star gaia_angelright



pockybot
Olya
First of all, prices at Target and Walmart are not the same. There is about $1-$5 difference in price and some things are cheaper at Walmart while others are cheaper at Target.

Second, every retailer must position itself in a unique manner in order to compete successfully. There is absolutely no sense in having two stores that sell exact same s**t for exactly the same price to exactly the same consumer.

Third, there has always been a difference in lifestyle of varying demographics. It is not a uniquely American phenomenon and it is not a new concept that sprung up in the 21st century. I have yet to find any compelling evidence for the benefit of a homogeneous society.

gaia_angelleft gaia_star gaia_angelright


Well exactly. Consumer america is split into the have nots, and the have nots who think they are the haves but are still have nots. That's where Target comes in smile For the people who want to think they're a few pegs above the Jerry Springer clientelle of Wally-mart
Olya's avatar
  • 100
  • 150
  • 150
I actually like Macy's and Target quite a bit. Though I think I'll be getting my jeggings from Old Navy.

gaia_angelleft gaia_star gaia_angelright



The Living Force
Shoulda gone to Ross.

Olya
And for the haves, there's Macy's, Bed Bath and Beyond, and Khol's where you can buy the same s**t for two to three times the price.

gaia_angelleft gaia_star gaia_angelright



pockybot
Olya
First of all, prices at Target and Walmart are not the same. There is about $1-$5 difference in price and some things are cheaper at Walmart while others are cheaper at Target.

Second, every retailer must position itself in a unique manner in order to compete successfully. There is absolutely no sense in having two stores that sell exact same s**t for exactly the same price to exactly the same consumer.

Third, there has always been a difference in lifestyle of varying demographics. It is not a uniquely American phenomenon and it is not a new concept that sprung up in the 21st century. I have yet to find any compelling evidence for the benefit of a homogeneous society.

gaia_angelleft gaia_star gaia_angelright


Well exactly. Consumer america is split into the have nots, and the have nots who think they are the haves but are still have nots. That's where Target comes in smile For the people who want to think they're a few pegs above the Jerry Springer clientelle of Wally-mart
I honestly can't remember what's at each place, lol.
Olya
I actually like Macy's and Target quite a bit. Though I think I'll be getting my jeggings from Old Navy.

gaia_angelleft gaia_star gaia_angelright



The Living Force
Shoulda gone to Ross.

Olya
And for the haves, there's Macy's, Bed Bath and Beyond, and Khol's where you can buy the same s**t for two to three times the price.

gaia_angelleft gaia_star gaia_angelright



pockybot
Olya
First of all, prices at Target and Walmart are not the same. There is about $1-$5 difference in price and some things are cheaper at Walmart while others are cheaper at Target.

Second, every retailer must position itself in a unique manner in order to compete successfully. There is absolutely no sense in having two stores that sell exact same s**t for exactly the same price to exactly the same consumer.

Third, there has always been a difference in lifestyle of varying demographics. It is not a uniquely American phenomenon and it is not a new concept that sprung up in the 21st century. I have yet to find any compelling evidence for the benefit of a homogeneous society.

gaia_angelleft gaia_star gaia_angelright


Well exactly. Consumer america is split into the have nots, and the have nots who think they are the haves but are still have nots. That's where Target comes in smile For the people who want to think they're a few pegs above the Jerry Springer clientelle of Wally-mart
Olya's avatar
  • 100
  • 150
  • 150
Lancome is at Macy's 4laugh

gaia_angelleft gaia_star gaia_angelright



The Living Force
I honestly can't remember what's at each place, lol.
Olya
I actually like Macy's and Target quite a bit. Though I think I'll be getting my jeggings from Old Navy.

gaia_angelleft gaia_star gaia_angelright



The Living Force
Shoulda gone to Ross.

Olya
And for the haves, there's Macy's, Bed Bath and Beyond, and Khol's where you can buy the same s**t for two to three times the price.

gaia_angelleft gaia_star gaia_angelright



pockybot
Olya
First of all, prices at Target and Walmart are not the same. There is about $1-$5 difference in price and some things are cheaper at Walmart while others are cheaper at Target.

Second, every retailer must position itself in a unique manner in order to compete successfully. There is absolutely no sense in having two stores that sell exact same s**t for exactly the same price to exactly the same consumer.

Third, there has always been a difference in lifestyle of varying demographics. It is not a uniquely American phenomenon and it is not a new concept that sprung up in the 21st century. I have yet to find any compelling evidence for the benefit of a homogeneous society.

gaia_angelleft gaia_star gaia_angelright


Well exactly. Consumer america is split into the have nots, and the have nots who think they are the haves but are still have nots. That's where Target comes in smile For the people who want to think they're a few pegs above the Jerry Springer clientelle of Wally-mart
Make-up, right? What's the difference between other companies in the price range?
Olya
Lancome is at Macy's 4laugh

gaia_angelleft gaia_star gaia_angelright



The Living Force
I honestly can't remember what's at each place, lol.
Olya
I actually like Macy's and Target quite a bit. Though I think I'll be getting my jeggings from Old Navy.

gaia_angelleft gaia_star gaia_angelright



The Living Force
Shoulda gone to Ross.

Olya
And for the haves, there's Macy's, Bed Bath and Beyond, and Khol's where you can buy the same s**t for two to three times the price.

gaia_angelleft gaia_star gaia_angelright



Olya's avatar
  • 100
  • 150
  • 150
It's pretty top of the line. Expensive, but for a change worth it. You're looking at paying $35 for mascara, but it is silky, deep, doesn't flake, and lengthens like s.o.b.

I can cheap out on most other stuff and go with L'Oreal or Revlon, but mascara is sacred.

gaia_angelleft gaia_star gaia_angelright



The Living Force
Make-up, right? What's the difference between other companies in the price range?
Olya
Lancome is at Macy's 4laugh

gaia_angelleft gaia_star gaia_angelright



The Living Force
I honestly can't remember what's at each place, lol.
Olya
I actually like Macy's and Target quite a bit. Though I think I'll be getting my jeggings from Old Navy.

gaia_angelleft gaia_star gaia_angelright



The Living Force
Shoulda gone to Ross.

Olya
And for the haves, there's Macy's, Bed Bath and Beyond, and Khol's where you can buy the same s**t for two to three times the price.

gaia_angelleft gaia_star gaia_angelright



Gotcha.
Olya
It's pretty top of the line. Expensive, but for a change worth it. You're looking at paying $35 for mascara, but it is silky, deep, doesn't flake, and lengthens like s.o.b.

I can cheap out on most other stuff and go with L'Oreal or Revlon, but mascara is sacred.

gaia_angelleft gaia_star gaia_angelright



The Living Force
Make-up, right? What's the difference between other companies in the price range?
Olya
Lancome is at Macy's 4laugh

gaia_angelleft gaia_star gaia_angelright



The Living Force
I honestly can't remember what's at each place, lol.
Olya
I actually like Macy's and Target quite a bit. Though I think I'll be getting my jeggings from Old Navy.

gaia_angelleft gaia_star gaia_angelright



pockybot
Meroko_Love
pockybot
Believe it or not I actually often find a lot of the conservative Christian midwest/southerner types liberals hate to be more down to earth and friendly than the smarmy yuppy types. Sure they may vote for rich conservatives, but they tend to have less money to work with and seem more HUMBLE.

They do tend to have less money and be working class, but yet they vote for capitalist class politicians and policies. Hmmm, Marx's theory of false consciousness, anyone? wink

Quote:
Even the Occupy kids seem to be complaining about first world big city probems(omg, my Latte wasnt made right...my laptop doesnt get wi fi in here)

I have not seen this at all. The Occupy people have been very nice, down-to-earth and almost borderline hippie many of them. Have you experienced Occupy protestors like this?



1. Yeah it's a riot...poor white midwestern and southerners voting for fake smile wall street puppets like Bush. Gosh bless em smile

2. I'm in California. I found most the Occupy movement pointless and annoying...and I'm about as leftist as it gets


I accept your challenge. biggrin

Quick Reply

Submit
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get Items
Get Gaia Cash
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff