Harry Parachute
(?)Community Member
- Report Post
- Posted: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 07:33:19 +0000
Louis_de_Pointe_du_Lac
Harry Parachute
Louis_de_Pointe_du_Lac
Oh, and God knows, communism states "go kill Tibetans".
*looks*
Yeah... right there on the front page. "Kill all Tibetans".
*looks*
Yeah... right there on the front page. "Kill all Tibetans".
I believe this is the argument that leads up to "Well we really haven't had a true Communist government yet".
Wonder why that is?
Oh riiiiight, they collapse and start murdering their own population for the good of the party.
Ho-hum.
In response, I quote you exactly: "Well we really haven't had a true Communist government yet."
By the same token, probably never will.
And the "murdering of their population" was only suggested at.
Imagine the poor of America saying they wanted the rich to be equal with them. Would the rich EVER, no matter what happens, accept that?
Marx said "get rid of the rich". Never really said kill them off. Export them. Whatever.
Oh look, a relativist. Wow, what a rare ********' breed among the moonbat youth.
Kissing cousins of the Socialists, National Socialists that is, had a similar relationship to their targets of ideological hate-speech. "We haven't really said kill them...just get rid of the (Fill in Blank). Deport them. Whatever."
Welcome to the wonderful world of the politics of marginalization.
Appropriately enough, the National Socialist actually benefits their target group because they have as their backbone an economic system based on supply and demand as they pillage, rape, and extort their neighbors and scapegoats until an external force comes to stamp out their tyranny through armed conflict.
Communism can't even survive with economic competition.
Also? The poor want to be rich? They can find a way to benefit the market, the lazy bitches. There's a reason the brain surgeon gets more than the garbageman. You can g'head and figure that one out on your own.
Quote:
Of course,you and I can not really argue about which political system is best no more than we can argue over which religion is right. It is all opinion and hearsay. The argument is moot and a conclusion can not be reached.
...Huh?
No, sorry.
Religion as an explanation of metaphysics can't be argued because they have no basis in the physical world.
Political systems do. Communism failed as a superpower and drove its people into misery and starvation when it didn't outright "purge" them. Capitalism survived.
Quote:
I must say, however, that your rudeness is unjustified, as is your agression towards communism. If you want to discuss, do it peacefully and calmly.
******** you.
Communism has murdered over 100 million people. I'd say that's a pretty goddamned good justification for my aggression.
That's like a KKK member coming up to me and saying "Let's discuss this whole 'hang blacks for fun' thang in a civil manner."