Outrun The Halfling
(?)Community Member
- Report Post
- Posted: Wed, 05 Mar 2008 20:23:19 +0000
leloi
In anthropology we discussed inbreeding. One of the main concerns brought up was that it's "anti-social." If it stays IN the family then there's no new fresh blood/outsiders coming into the family. They stay in their own little world away from everyone else... because they have no need for anyone else.
With no new fresh blood recessive traits start to show up in individuals. Examples? Hemophilia in the royal family of Europe. It's recessive but if everyone in the family is recessive then it starts to pop up. The royal family was breeding in a small gene pool, mostly between cousins for a long time.
And it doesn't take one generation of inbreeding to create all the problems... it takes a few for all those problems to pop out. But as said before, it's anti-social. If the practice becomes "accepted and "normal" for a family then there's going to be plenty of problems down the road. It could be a practice passed down. If mom and dad were siblings what's going to stop the next generation from continuing that practice... and the generation after that... and after that?
So it's become a taboo in human society to keep the gene pool fresh and to keep everyone socialized... and with the taboo comes the rumors. Rumors such as "If you do it your child will be severely deformed!" Truth behind that rumor? No... it takes a couple of generations. It even shows up in the Bible... especially Genesis (if you take it literally that Adam and Eve really were the only two humans) and the story of Lot (his daughters got pregnant by him). The generations after them weren't affected by instances of inbreeding.
And just look at dogs. Humans create breeds by using inbreeding. Mating daughter to sire together doesn't create a 5 legged puppy. It just makes the family traits a little stronger. But with all those generations it does create health problems such as heart problems, hip problems, etc.
With no new fresh blood recessive traits start to show up in individuals. Examples? Hemophilia in the royal family of Europe. It's recessive but if everyone in the family is recessive then it starts to pop up. The royal family was breeding in a small gene pool, mostly between cousins for a long time.
And it doesn't take one generation of inbreeding to create all the problems... it takes a few for all those problems to pop out. But as said before, it's anti-social. If the practice becomes "accepted and "normal" for a family then there's going to be plenty of problems down the road. It could be a practice passed down. If mom and dad were siblings what's going to stop the next generation from continuing that practice... and the generation after that... and after that?
So it's become a taboo in human society to keep the gene pool fresh and to keep everyone socialized... and with the taboo comes the rumors. Rumors such as "If you do it your child will be severely deformed!" Truth behind that rumor? No... it takes a couple of generations. It even shows up in the Bible... especially Genesis (if you take it literally that Adam and Eve really were the only two humans) and the story of Lot (his daughters got pregnant by him). The generations after them weren't affected by instances of inbreeding.
And just look at dogs. Humans create breeds by using inbreeding. Mating daughter to sire together doesn't create a 5 legged puppy. It just makes the family traits a little stronger. But with all those generations it does create health problems such as heart problems, hip problems, etc.
How nuts, I had the same exact discussion and topic coverage in my anthropology class.