Fermionic
Suicidesoldier#1
Fermionic
Nila Nycto
Suicidesoldier#1
IT IS EVERYTHING. ._.
Along with good morals and things.
gs?
I wouldn't say that morals and intelligence necessarily go hand in hand.
Let's look at Hitler, shall we? Undoubtedly an intelligent man, but his morals weren't worth what a pig could spit.
No, Hitler was very stupid.
This has been proven time and time again.
In what way?
Well, all his Generals hated him. He had very poor war plans and strategies and tactics and things, and often times messed things up- we decided not to kill Hitler becuase he was deemed more of a detriment to their military alive then dead. The technology he personally oversaw, such as the tank, bolt action rifles and some other things were generally of very poor designs, with the only merits being other people's desigsns. For instance, while his panzer tanks were strong, this mostly responsible for german engineers, his own personal design saw a very expensive and crappy type of armor. While it could deflect a sherman round, it had no virtually side armor, and it had no turret, I.E. you could not aim your weapon without moving the entire vehicle. In that way if you wanted to hit someone say, straight in front of you, it was fine, but sense it had no maneuverability it might take a minute to get on target for a target that is just say, 15 degrees to the left. Rather than being able to aim your weapon, you had to move your entire vehicle to get on target- then, they had no side armor.
Even though our Sherman tanks were crap, all they had to do was flank a German tank and down it went. Our non-explosive rounds could tear right through their tanks- but not becuase they didn't try. No, all of the armor was in the front of the tank, which was super expensive, and hard to make, and limited production, but also made it weaker sense it had no side armor and couldn't turn sideways. It would be like making it so if you wanted to look at something you would have to turn your entire body sideways instead of being able to turn your head, but imagine you are even slower at turning around than an elephant.
Bolt action rifles? Oh man, it was possible to move around or do anything with them. You might as well only had one shot. In Close quarters combat, city fighting, you are going to issue 44 inch long weapons that are extremely hard to reload? They might as well have been using muskets. We could fire off multiple shots and they only had one, so they went bang and we went bang bang.
This is what he personally decided sense he thought it was best. The world's first assault rifle, invented at the time, now the type of weapon used by all modern milatiries, was rejected by Hitler sense he didn't see the value- ironically, we had already been establishing similar weapons for years. The only good weapons coming out he ignored. Talk about "lightning war" and then using bolt actions, which are super slow to reload and fire.
rolleyes
His strategy was hit hard and fast- duh! So is anyone's. That's not really a strategy. A strategy would be that at 6 o clock zulu time 15 minutes after our initial raid we'll have our second commando unit come around the back and wipe out anyone trying to run away, box them in when they are perfectly unprepared.
Hitler's strategy was to attack his enemy head on, rather than sneak around, use ambushes, or flank them.
Then we talk about the oversight. He used his supposedly best troops, SS, to kill civilians rather than fight his enemies. He fought a two front war stupidly declaring war on Russia who thought that Hitler would never attack him. He decided that atom bombs were stupid so he only had 9 scientists working on how to figure them out. He believed that Germans were of ATLANTEAN descendence and that of a pure breed they would have magical powers for God's sakes- I mean, what supper powers even, just "super powers", not super strength or flight, just "super powers", a baseless mindless accusation.
Then, he killed like 11 million Jewish people- why? They walked into a death camp for him so why not use them a soldiers, cannon fodder at the least? Lots of people throughout history have used captured enemy soldiers or prisoners as bait, to bait an enemy into an ambush.
He could have won major battles that way, simultaneously killing off all the Jews using them as soldiers.
BUT NO! Uses soldiers, millions, to eliminate Jews that probably would have fought "for Germany". An absolute moron. Nothing this guy did was intelligent at all, which is obvious given the basis for his beliefs. ._.
100
100
200
