augustine17
Offline
Post: 55891853_46 created on Wed Nov 04, 2009 1:57 amPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 1:57 am
![]() |
augustine17 killing under conditions in general can be justified, as long as it is not in the name of the killing... my opinion is fighting and killing can be justified further than just protection of physical but can be carried over to idealistic protection (such as morality, or other Christian priorities) thus fighting can be brought about in enemy territory, as an attack in regards to defending an ideal... the way i see it: you must be in mindset of readiness to die rather than kill- i also believe that both sides can be in the right. also all Christian sects are derived from roman catholics which was the early church mended with Greco-Roman idealism and philosophy... the romans held honor and duty in very high regards, thus it is that fighting was quickly moralized in a community in which it was completely necessary. also fighting ( i talk of war very generally as to push my ideal of acceptance of combat in all areas) is inevitable if you want world morality rather than world piece. BUT as a Christian you must always hold war ethics and honor very strongly, and choose your battles very carefully, you must always remember (as Saint Peter forgot) that the message and significance to the cause is more important than the general defense of thing, by this i mean if you are to be a marauder have it have some message rather than to die in vain anyone bother reading this? |
|














