Welcome to Gaia! ::

Not only is this bullshit and bad science, it's already another thread.
If black people are less intelligent it would be so minute that it would not make an actual difference in African affairs.
User Image
African's are not stupid! The ones who study in schools have to get a 100 percent average to get to university. AND how about Salmawi? The author of "Of bettles and of angels". He is a BLACK, REFUGEE from AFRICA who came to AMERICA and got in to HARVARD UNIVERSITY with HIGH honour marks. Did a mention that he has best selling books?

...candy
that s f****ed up .. xp
Black people mainstream in the 'ganster' or thiings like that so those poeple are averagely stupider


EDIT: Forgot to add one thing,
I know some very smart staight a black people, I also know some white people who have failed several times, it only depends on how your braught up to education, and your availablity to education, how THOSE vary on race is the point he is making I believe/.
link2822
smokaccino
People in Africa might not have the same sources to education that we have.

And someone's attitude =/= intelligence.


or the envierment didn't require them to have as much brain mass


Yeah, having to think of methods of survival on a daily basis is sure to turn your brain into mush. >.>


I don't think people should be thrown out just for saying things that other people don't like, but they should be thrown out when they say idiotic statements that don't seem to be grounded in fact or reality for the sake of shocking people or because they're jerks who like insulting groups of people and trying to use past "achievements" as proof of credibility.
I like how his claims are said to be "unfounded". Yeah, us white people were just "given" our society, we didn't build it at all. The fact it that places dominated by what is traditionally considered "black" have not advanced as far as Europeans ("whites" wink did. That's not to say that dark-skinned people have never or will never amount to anything - Egypt was pretty much the capital of the world for a long period of time, and Middle Eastern/"Muslim Countries" were almost as mathematically advanced as we are now while white people lived in s**t and couldn't figure out what was making us so damn sick all the time - the majority of them just kind of suck right now. I think it's "Nature or Nurture?" and African societies have just had it built into them to not amount to anything.

At the very least, he has empirical/observational evidence to support the basis of his claims.
bluerain202's avatar
  • 100
  • 200
  • 100
deep-fried pipe-bomb
I like how his claims are said to be "unfounded". Yeah, us white people were just "given" our society, we didn't build it at all. The fact it that places dominated by what is traditionally considered "black" have not advanced as far as Europeans ("whites" wink did. That's not to say that dark-skinned people have never or will never amount to anything - Egypt was pretty much the capital of the world for a long period of time, and Middle Eastern/"Muslim Countries" were almost as mathematically advanced as we are now while white people lived in s**t and couldn't figure out what was making us so damn sick all the time - the majority of them just kind of suck right now. I think it's "Nature or Nurture?" and African societies have just had it built into them to not amount to anything.

At the very least, he has empirical/observational evidence to support the basis of his claims.

AH, so Africans are stupid because the World Bank manipulated/devasted many of their economies? K
You just disproved your idiocy by naming all of the great non-white civilizations. And guess what, America isn't all white :O, we won WWII partly because of the Navajo Code Talkers.
Let's not mention that the leader in technological development has been Japan for the past, what thirty fourty years?
There is no proof, nothing. Governments and states of a country has no impact on a personal quality such as intelligence. That's called a generalization.
Is there need to tell you any more that generalization isn't a valid observation? hm.
Even if this is true, why does it matter? What good does it do to even research something like this? Scientific studies are used to advance, but I do not see the benefit of learning the results.

Discriminating others because of there intelligence is no different then racism or any other kind of prejudice.
There is one thing I slightly agree with this guy about:
Quote:
“there is no firm reason to anticipate that the intellectual capacities of peoples geographically separated in their evolution should prove to have evolved identically. Our wanting to reserve equal powers of reason as some universal heritage of humanity will not be enough to make it so”.


Actually, it makes perfect sense that geographically separated peoples would evolve different intellectual capacities.
However:
There is no reason to assume that the intellectual capacity of Africans is lower than that of Western European; in fact, it might make sense logically to assume that they should have evolved with a higher intellectual capacity because, with their much limited resources in the deserts of Africa, they had to develop more intelligence in order to survive. Also, why not apply that logic to other areas of the world? Does this scientiest also assume that polynesian intellectual capacities or Japanese intellectual capacities vary greatly, because they were separated evolutionarily? Why just look at Africans here?
It is important to note here the enormous difference between intellectual capacity and intelligence/knowledge He might be right that African-Americans as a whole test lower than descendents of European or Asian countries (I don't know, I haven't seen any of the data on this stuff). However, this hardly proves that their intellectual capacity is lower. There are a number of factors that could contribute to this, including that because of cultural and economic factors, African-Americans as a whole might be recieving less education and/or have less of an academic-encouraging environment.

Besides, I'm sure African Americans have integrated enough into society and interbreeded (that word sounds horrible in this context but I can't think of a better one and you know what i mean) with European descendents enough to make the possible evolutionary difference nonexistant at this point.
bluerain202
AH, so Africans are stupid because the World Bank manipulated/devasted many of their economies? K
You just disproved your idiocy by naming all of the great non-white civilizations. And guess what, America isn't all white :O, we won WWII partly because of the Navajo Code Talkers.
Let's not mention that the leader in technological development has been Japan for the past, what thirty fourty years?
There is no proof, nothing. Governments and states of a country has no impact on a personal quality such as intelligence. That's called a generalization.
Is there need to tell you any more that generalization isn't a valid observation? hm.


1. "Manipulated/devasted [sic] many of their economies?"
You mean like history has done to the Jews time and time again for thousands of years, forcing them from one place to another? Except that the Jews accomplished something with themselves, ******** click* didn't.

2. I think you mean I proved my idiocy by naming all the great non-white civilizations, except for that to be true there would need to have only been those few civilizations I mentioned, which would mean that 90% of the great civilizations have been white, and would support my point. Way to go, you.

3. We won WWII partly because of the code-talkers which, by the way, could have been any language code. We only used Navajo because it was more convenient to use a language that people already knew exclusively in America, rather than invent a new one. It's much easier to recruit than it is to train. Also, equally or of greater importance were the many "white" inventors that gave us a technological advantage, as well as the "white" Europeans who did most of the work.

4. Let's not mention Japan, because it has not invented anything new in the last 30-40 years. The major inventions were largely from the American, British, and French Industrial Revolutions. Japan has just made improvements on various European and American inventions.

5. The Government does not change the level of intelligence in a civilization, the level of intelligence in a civilization changes its Government. That is why it was African warlords that sold blacks into Chattel Slavery in America, and not the other way around.

Congratulations, you're wrong. How's public schooling working out for you? I see it has taught you to be passive aggressively insulting, but I know how to do that, too.
October Peahen
Discriminating others because of there intelligence is no different then racism or any other kind of prejudice.


So you'd be happy with an untrained moron performing brain-surgery on you? The difference between discriminating based on race and intelligence is that intelligence is a measurable quality proven to matter, whereas race hasn't.
Ahahahahahahaheheheh - He is SO voodoo'd. mad
bluerain202's avatar
  • 100
  • 200
  • 100
deep-fried pipe-bomb
bluerain202
AH, so Africans are stupid because the World Bank manipulated/devasted many of their economies? K
You just disproved your idiocy by naming all of the great non-white civilizations. And guess what, America isn't all white :O, we won WWII partly because of the Navajo Code Talkers.
Let's not mention that the leader in technological development has been Japan for the past, what thirty fourty years?
There is no proof, nothing. Governments and states of a country has no impact on a personal quality such as intelligence. That's called a generalization.
Is there need to tell you any more that generalization isn't a valid observation? hm.


1. "Manipulated/devasted [sic] many of their economies?"
You mean like history has done to the Jews time and time again for thousands of years, forcing them from one place to another? Except that the Jews accomplished something with themselves, ******** click* didn't.

2. I think you mean I proved my idiocy by naming all the great non-white civilizations, except for that to be true there would need to have only been those few civilizations I mentioned, which would mean that 90% of the great civilizations have been white, and would support my point. Way to go, you.

3. We won WWII partly because of the code-talkers which, by the way, could have been any language code. We only used Navajo because it was more convenient to use a language that people already knew exclusively in America, rather than invent a new one. It's much easier to recruit than it is to train. Also, equally or of greater importance were the many "white" inventors that gave us a technological advantage, as well as the "white" Europeans who did most of the work.

4. Let's not mention Japan, because it has not invented anything new in the last 30-40 years. The major inventions were largely from the American, British, and French Industrial Revolutions. Japan has just made improvements on various European and American inventions.

5. The Government does not change the level of intelligence in a civilization, the level of intelligence in a civilization changes its Government. That is why it was African warlords that sold blacks into Chattel Slavery in America, and not the other way around.

Congratulations, you're wrong. How's public schooling working out for you? I see it has taught you to be passive aggressively insulting, but I know how to do that, too.

I've been privately educated, but since you are a racist I'm just not going to bother to even attempt to sway you. There's no point.
All I see are excuses. And Jews have had Albert Einstein n' Freud(though I hate the latter). Most of the number system you see here wasn't from White civilization, go read the book Zero: a biography of a number.
I'm not going to argue about s**t that has nothing to do with the topic at hand, which is this bigot's unsupported opinion. I don't care if you think you can support your white culture supremacy bulllshit, becasue it would have been known to you that through cultural diffusion we advanced together.
Egyptians invented paper for heaven's sake, you don't need to bullshit with "they improved on them". I'm sure the chinese's fireworks got improved special for July 4th.
/done discussing racist stupidity with you/
This thread again? How many times has this story been recycled in ED? People are really running with this topic. [Insert PC theres only humans.] A guess a story like this would give racists a justification to practice their beliefs, but what I find interesting is that there has yet to be information to prove that there is a geneological link between race and intelligence but there are studies which prove that less intelligent people are more likely to be prejudice.

Quick Reply

Submit
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get Items
Get Gaia Cash
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff