RivaNariko
(?)Community Member
- Report Post
- Posted: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 03:22:23 +0000
I had a teacher a few years ago that tried to explain affirmative action to us. Lets see...
She grew up in a low income neighborhood in Chicago, and her mom worked two jobs to be able to pay for her to go to a better school than the public school in her disctrict, so that she could have more opportunities. Her sister, on the other hand, was still going to the normal public school. (why she got to go to the good school and her sister didn't, I still don't understand) Because her sister wasn't going to as good of a school, she was not giving as much opportunity to excell as she was, and therefore, had more trouble on such tests as the SAT or other entrance exams. Because there is a much higher percentage of minorities living in poverty than Whites, the idea of affirmative action is to even out this imbalance. my teacher's sister is not any less intelligent than her, but because of her school, she doesn't do as well on tests, so why should she not be given the opportunity to go to college because of this?
I know that argument is full of holes, and I argued several of them with my teacher (none of which she answered, she did that a lot. loved it when I got into class discussions as long as I didn't disagree with her. stare ) but I'm trying to present the opposite side of the argument. personally, I don't agree with affirmative action and think that it encourages racism (racism is not only discriminating against minorities, but anyone on basis of their race) by continuing to seperate the races and proclaim to the world that we are different because of what continent our ancestors came from and should be treated so.
She grew up in a low income neighborhood in Chicago, and her mom worked two jobs to be able to pay for her to go to a better school than the public school in her disctrict, so that she could have more opportunities. Her sister, on the other hand, was still going to the normal public school. (why she got to go to the good school and her sister didn't, I still don't understand) Because her sister wasn't going to as good of a school, she was not giving as much opportunity to excell as she was, and therefore, had more trouble on such tests as the SAT or other entrance exams. Because there is a much higher percentage of minorities living in poverty than Whites, the idea of affirmative action is to even out this imbalance. my teacher's sister is not any less intelligent than her, but because of her school, she doesn't do as well on tests, so why should she not be given the opportunity to go to college because of this?
I know that argument is full of holes, and I argued several of them with my teacher (none of which she answered, she did that a lot. loved it when I got into class discussions as long as I didn't disagree with her. stare ) but I'm trying to present the opposite side of the argument. personally, I don't agree with affirmative action and think that it encourages racism (racism is not only discriminating against minorities, but anyone on basis of their race) by continuing to seperate the races and proclaim to the world that we are different because of what continent our ancestors came from and should be treated so.