The Bijoux
(?)Community Member
- Report Post
- Posted: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 06:00:59 +0000
The Drunken Jester
The Bijoux
The Drunken Jester
The Bijoux
The Drunken Jester
I'll let a Bram Stoker fan battle that one out. Since I don't think I watched that movie and I don't care about Dracula or Vampires.
But I'm not going to change my opinion on this. Like I said before. Sure, It's Henry Selick's movie. But it's still a Tim Burton creation.
But he didn't direct it. He wrote the origina; poem. How often do you source the writer of a novel for the creation of a movie?
That's like saying that Chris Columbus owns Harry Potter because he directed some of the Harry Potter movies.
Who said anything about owning? I'm talking about the creator and end product. JK Rowling did not direct the movie, and while the original story was hers, the movie was created by Chris Columbus. Without his direction you would have gotten something very different.
Well, I'm not saying that the movie is Tim Burton's. I'm saying the creation is.
He spent 9 years working on that idea. 9 years from the writing of the original poem to the production of the film.... well, 7 technically.
I don't take offense at saying the film itself isn't Tim Burton's. I take offense at saying that it's not his creation. He did a LOT of work on it before Henry Selick came into the picture.
Therefore I think it counts in the list of Tim Burton movies. And is my favorite that he ever had a hand in.
I don't argue that it was his original idea, but you cannot source him as the creator of the film in any way. He worked on the original for a long time. The POEM. But once it was being made into a film it became a Henry Selick creation. Tim Burton is not the director or creator of the FILM. The poem is NOT the film. The MOVIE is Henry Selick's creation. It is in the list of Henry Selick's movies. Sucks that it's your favorite since Tim Burton didn't make the movie. Choose a favorite that he created.