Kage No Oni
(?)Community Member
- Posted: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 20:35:20 +0000
I would like to appologize if someone has posted this before, but this was just burning my a** (Just read it a few minutes ago).
First off... From DanceSafe.org
and
Doesnt that just go completely against the fact that its a psychedelic type drug? I would imagine so.
What really bothered me was that raves and ravers get put in the same context of beatings and shootings. Seriously, is our culture really that bad and out of hand that we must just be shot down at random becuase some a*****e wants to make us look bad? If the permits were easier to obtain, Im sure that there would be more legal raves, and that police busts wouldnt happen as often (I kinda go to some of those weird raves where you have to go to checkpoints to get directions >.< wink .
Honestly, what do you guys have to say about this section of the artical?
Quote:
Slideshow began a decade ago as impromptu street parties faturing stunt driving. About two years ago, it took an ominous turn, with crashes, beatings, fatal shootings, and a rave like lunacy fuled by the psychedelic stimulant Ecstacy
First off... From DanceSafe.org
Quote:
Ecstasy is MDMA, or 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine. It belongs to a family of drugs called "entactogens," which literally means "touching within."
and
Quote:
MDMA is a "mood elevator" that produces a relaxed, euphoric state. It does not produce hallucinations.
Doesnt that just go completely against the fact that its a psychedelic type drug? I would imagine so.
What really bothered me was that raves and ravers get put in the same context of beatings and shootings. Seriously, is our culture really that bad and out of hand that we must just be shot down at random becuase some a*****e wants to make us look bad? If the permits were easier to obtain, Im sure that there would be more legal raves, and that police busts wouldnt happen as often (I kinda go to some of those weird raves where you have to go to checkpoints to get directions >.< wink .
Honestly, what do you guys have to say about this section of the artical?