MarkM117
LB-UK
Even if your points are valid and not just rambling from an xbox fanboy, it still doesn't change the fact that the Xbone is an overpriced box with inferior hardware to the PS4 and gimmicky features most gamers don't care about (saying "xbox, menu" instead of pushing one button? Really? That's innovation?
neutral ).
Also, I think limiting which regions can actually play the Xbone on launch is actually the dumbest thing they've done yet. They're practically telling millions of people worldwide to ******** off and buy a PS4.
the kinect can easily be turned off (like anyone towards an attitude like yours)
But you still have to pay for obtaining it, whether you want to use it, or not. That's....not a very good marketing strategy.
Quote:
graphically they wont be too different only load times will have a major difference (surprise! they're both going to be using blu-ray! which means only slight graphical time differences!. i've compared versions of games between the 360 and ps3. most times on the 360 you may beat us in graphics but we get better lighting, and better fps(frames per second in case you're confused). load times are milliseconds different if you have the game installed or not)
Except that.....nobody's complaining about graphics...
Quote:
besides, who cares about hardware? playing a game for graphics is like watching porn for the story. I don't care why debbie wants to go to dallas. i'm just trying to get off
So, if you recognize that hardware is not the issue, then why bring it up?
Quote:
paying for live gives us more protection than the psn gets.
No, it really doesn't. It just means you have a financial investment, that you can lose.
Quote:
remember the two months xbox live was down and our credit cards were stolen? neither do i.
That's because the hackers all had Live accounts. It's not that Live CAN'T be hacked. It's just that nobody has the inclination to.
In reality, it's no safer. Just more expensive. You're paying for a false sense of security.
Quote:
accounts may be stolen but that can't be helped no matter how hard you try. ask sony
Ok....So your argument is "We can still get hacked....but at least we're PAYING for it!"
Quote:
the only reasons you wouldn't get ps+ to play online with friends is because you have none or have none that are worth playing with.
That's right. It's because you're a Forever Alone guy, and not, perchance. someone who doesn't
HAVE to play "online" to play with your friends. It's not like we might have actual regionally close friends that we can play "old school" with, without the need for an ethernet cable....
Yeah...you know those little lights at the top of the controllers? The ones with the 1, 2, 3, and 4 on them? Whadda ya suppose those are for?
Quote:
last i checked MMOs have pay-to-play and seem to do just fine
Not all of them are pay to play. And not all of them "do just fine".
Quote:
Sony has practically stated that they don't care if you pirate their games thus losing them mass amounts of money forcing them to go broke
And you just proved that you know nothing about economics. Nice.
So tell me, then: If you believe that bullshit, then why hasn't
EVERY SINGLE MOTOR VEHICLE PRODUCER ON THE PLANET, gone under?
If I buy a car for full price, and then after a few years, sell it to someone else....am I
really screwing Ford? No. They got the full price of the vehicle, the first time it was sold. The only person being screwed in
ANY sense, is the seller. And even that, is only in the sense that he is getting less for it, than he paid for it. He's actually taking a loss on the investment. The producer, however, suffers no loss of profit, from the transaction.
Very few producers are ever given payment for their products, beyond the initial retail sale, unless their products are strictly rental only. Yet they all seem to survive comfortably.
You're just buying into Microsoft's bullshit sob-story, while they sucker you out of every penny they can whittle out of your pocket. And that makes you look really silly.
Seriously. Owning anything Xbox related, is the equivalent of setting fire to a sack of money
Quote:
the regions they aren't releasing in are also regions where either they have their own internet that is policed by the government and thus limiting them massively (china, japan)
their internet is either dial-up, cable, DSL, FTTH, mobile, wireless and satellite(russia)
or limits such as the number of ISP subscriptions, overall number of hosts, IXP-traffic, and overall available bandwidth are so low they most likely wouldn't be able to connect or afford to anyway(africa).
And that makes it ok?
I'd say that doesn't serve as much as an "acceptable excuse", as a "reason why someone should be fired."