Teatime Brutality
- Quote
- Report Post
- Posted: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 12:49:26 +0000
Technologist Tony Stark
I was worried I'd have nothing to contribute here, but it looks like a very fun space to start to feel out just what Marvel is, especially getting a feel for the MU. There's a certain je ne sait quoi about the DCU that I grasped very early on- I think the first non-Vertigo/Wildstorm DC book I ever picked up was Azzarello's Superman while I think my Marvel reading was largely uninterrupted from when I was fourteen until now, so about a decade and yet I couldn't ever really say that I've had a handle on what the MU is in that same sense.
I think its hard to get a grasp on what sort of a space the MU is, because it isn't one. Or at least it isn't one in the way that the DCU is. It's more like an artefact.
The DCU's a conceptual space that was created when people started squashing different stories together and deciding that they 'shared a universe', and over the years that process of combining, dividing and understanding the conceptual space has become the focus of much activity in the fiction.
A Crisis is a painting about its canvas.
That brings its own problems, but by foregrounding its spatiality, the DCU makes explicit that it isn't a story, that it isn't a history. It's a place where stories and histories happen. This allows for an incredible variety of tone, ideology and technique. Sandman could never ever have grown out of any other shared comics universe. The DCU's the only kind of soil in which trees like that will fruit.
It is possible to see the Marvel Universe as one story, one history though. Its main virtue is the integrity, cohesion and wholeness that the DCU finds its main virtue in lacking. I'm not talking here about anything as boring as "Marvel's continuity is more linear than DC's" - that's just a side effect of what's going on here. It's a universe that grew up as a universe, rather than through the cellular fusion of vigorously frotaging narratives.
There's a mechanical quality to the MU...it's like a horologist fitting together lots of little cogs and calling it a "watch", whereas the DCU is more like an artist taking a handful of little cogs, throwing them across a beach and yelling out, "I call it....THE SHORES OF FOREVER!"
Obviously what I'm trying to say is something you've heard me say a good few times before...I think the DCU is a postmodern space and that the MU is a modernist object.
Ihab Hassan once wrote a list of oppositions helpful in getting the whole modernism/postmodernism thing. I expect Oni's seen it around, but it's still fun having a look down it and seeing the extent to which it could be talking about the Marvel and DC universes.
Modernism / Postmodernism
Romanticism/Symbolism / Pataphysics/Dadaism
Form (conjunctive, closed) / Antiform (disjunctive, open)
Purpose / Play
Design / Chance
Hierarchy / Anarchy
Mastery/Logos / Exhaustion/Silence
Art Object/Finished Work / Process/Performance/Happening
Distance / Participation
Creation/Totalization / Decreation/Deconstruction
Synthesis / Antithesis
Presence / Absence
Centering / Dispersal
Genre/Boundary / Text/Intertext
Semantics / Rhetoric
Paradigm / Syntagm
Hypotaxis / Parataxis
Metaphor / Metonymy
Selection / Combination
Root/Depth / Rhizome/Surface
Interpretation/Reading / Against Interpretation/Misreading
Signified / Signifier
Lisible (Readerly) / Scriptible (Writerly)
Narrative/Grande Histoire / Anti-narrative/Petite Histoire
Master Code / Idiolect
Symptom / Desire
Type / Mutant
Genital/Phallic / Polymorphous/Androgynous
Paranoia / Schizophrenia
Origin/Cause / Difference-Differance/Trace
God the Father / The Holy Ghost
Metaphysics / Irony
Determinacy/ Indeterminancy
Transcendence / Immanence
I might go through them later and see which ones fit and which don't. Or that might be your homework.