Recursive Paradox
Syndactyly
Recursive Paradox
Syndactyly
Men are expected to be strong, the providers, and all the other stereotypical roles, and women condone and encourage these stereotypes.
But women do not have the social power to enforce these stereotypes. Only men do.
I obviously don't agree with this. I believe a lot of men buy into these stereotypes because of social pressures fro women. I don't think any of us could prove either way.
I've already logically established it in the past using the statistics regarding what women and men face socially. So I feel I've already proven it.
Wut. Well, not in this argument. I'd appreciate it if you did that again, it would make your argument more solid and I might concede if you can prove it.
Recursive Paradox
Quote:
I do have a source, but it is dated and does not have statistics on this basic issue. But it does explain in a nutshell why/how men are oppressed mostly by other men, and also how women add fuel to the fire as well.
Women do nothing more than add a mild social push to the equation. Calling that oppression is a little bit ridiculous.
A push is a push. I don't care if you think it's big or small. And they do oppress in reaction to a man who does not take that push.
Recursive Paradox
Quote:
Men are harassed and beaten by other men for not meeting these roles.
More often these are responses to incorporation of feminine elements, homosexuality and being trans.
Not necessarily. A lot of men beat each other up on other subjects such as fighting over women, money/greed, or simple bucking heads and challenged masculinity.
Recursive Paradox
Quote:
But in terms of beatings, men are much more beaten by other men than women are beaten by men. Men are the victims of the most beatings and murders at least in the United States.
Men also hold the most resources and are better targets for greed related murders and beatings than women are, mostly cuz society constructs women as property, not owners of property. Whereas men are owners of property.
Women are not property. Try again. You're turning into a radical feminist in the argument and it's not helping your argument.
Recursive Paradox
Quote:
Come close? Maybe not. But yuo said men weren't oppressed. I'm not saying they're oppressed nearly as much as women, but I don't appreciate your claim that men have it easy. You should know better, you've had to fight the role of your birth sex for a long time.
My struggles as a trans woman aren't the struggles of men. Cis men do not face what I do. They do not face what you do. They do not face what cis women do. They do have it easy.
You did, however, have to live in the role of male. Or are you saying you came out as a girl in your youth and was always able to live as a transwoman? Was there not a time in your life where you had no clue you were trans and thought you were a guy?
I don't believe cismen have it easy. A cisman is much more likely to have the s**t beat out of him than any transman or woman. I even think the chances of a cisman getting the s**t beat out of him are higher than a transwoman's. Can every transwoman say she's been in a fight
as a transwoman (not before her transition)? Because every many I've ever spoken to over the age of 25 has been in a fight. Obviously this is anecdotal but I don't have any reason to see it differently unless a trusted source says otherwise.
Recursive Paradox
Quote:
I am basing this on what I know not only about my own experiences but of the experiences of other men (cis and trans). My own experiences are a VERY small piece of the puzzle here, I am mostly talking about males as a gender, perceived completely as male. I am not talking about the whole transgender piece of the puzzle in this instance, but it does apply to us as trangender individuals once our medical history is no longer "public record" (once not everyone knows about it and we blend into our respective roles).
Any trans man's experiences you apply to this have the confounding variable of trans oppression attached to them.
What? How the ******** is that?
First of all, I am received in the public AS A MAN. People don't know I'm trans, they respond to me as they would any other man. So I do experience what a lot of men go through.
Second, how does applying my experiences as a transman as comparable to that of ANY man trans oppressing? Would it not be oppressing to separate transmen from "normal" men, putting them on the spot as not "really" men?
Recursive Paradox
How many cis men do you know face systemic downgrading, application of ownership and denial of rights based on disruption of social roles that do not involve femininity?
Alright.
Systematic downgrading happens a lot, to men, by other men. Application of ownership can be applied in gay relationships of even by overbearing women on their men. As for denial or rights against women, CITATION NEEDED.
Oh, and by your logic, including the denial of rights of a transwoman would be trans oppressing.
Recursive Paradox
Quote:
No, you don't.
Quote:
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/oppress
Main Entry: op·press
1 a archaic :
suppress b : to crush or burden by abuse of power or authority
2 : to burden spiritually or mentally : weigh heavily upon
"by abuse of power or authority": A group does not have power or authority over itself. Your definition backs me.
Quote:
Wikipedia explains internalized oppression, which obviously is a form of oppression:
Quote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oppression#Internalized_oppression
In sociology and psychology, internalized oppression is the manner in which an oppressed group comes to use against itself the methods of the oppressor.
[...]
Any social group can internalize prejudice.
Internalization requires the methods of an external oppressor to be there first to internalize. What external oppressor oppresses men? None. This definition backs me as well.
You said men weren't oppressed, period. That's absolutely not true.