Patella
1. explain why it's wrong.
It's wrong because there wasn't an ocean yet, or surface water. The water cycle depends upon water evaporating, condensing into clouds, and raining.
The water (most likely) came from volcanoes releasing steam, ash and gases. This would not only allow the formation of an atmosphere, but also the first rains. After it starts to rain, then the water cycle can begin.
Patella
2. so you
outright said that in 2 billion years, it
never rained. Alright, find me a reference source that says that. FYI the bible isn't one.
I said I was talking about the first time it rained, not when that happened.
Patella
3. you thought I said that rain created earth's atmosphere? Good work. I said there was water and an atmosphere, thus it could support life, and would make percipitation possible. Why would I state that rain created the dinosaurs or the atmosphere?
You said:
Patella previously
The atmosphere would also account for the dinosaurs, and since the first multi-cellular organisms were aquatic, I guess that requires water and an atmosphere.
I don't understand what that means. An atmosphere doesn't account for dinosaurs. The fact that dinosaurs breathed air and flew would account for an atmosphere though.
Patella
4.The first one isn't wiki. Plus, I read through everything before I post to check for errors and that it makes sense.
And you've published many papers on the early earth, geology and biology? Sorry, but using yourself as a scholarly source isn't such a great idea.
Patella
5.yeah, I know. I studied evolution. I read the scientific findings on it. I know my stuff. You just read it wrong. Again.
You wrote:
Patella
According to this, your water and atmosphere appeared before the first life on earth.
And I responded by saying, "According to reasoning, water would almost certainly be required for the first cells to be created." Can you point out my error, without pointing one out in your argument, since we both said the same thing? That is, the earth almost certainly had an atmosphere and surface water before life began?
Patella
6. actually, I was trying to take it back to the original topic. But it seems like you still want to talk about the weather. :roll
You should realize that I wrote my comment as a joke, as I said. You didn't get it, in accordance to rule 666.5. You then go on to make silly arguments telling me that I'm wrong.
You see, the joke is, there was a great flood, because it is highly unlikely that the earth formed with oceans. There had to be massive amounts of rain to create them, and, in covering vast swaths of the planet, that would certainly be considered a "flood".
I never said life existed before this, since that would be wrong. Life, as we know it, depends upon things that just didn't exist on the very young earth.
Aside from that, there is no "topic" to get back to. Evolution is fact, and creationism is unprovable. Yay! But the "debate" goes on, with each new person saying, "The Bible is true! We're all children of Adam and rib lady Eve! Dinosaur bones were put there by the devil because he's so mean!"