XflintX
So a bunch of dirt was floating around and smushed together to create the Earth. Then Lava came up from the Earth and created the land. Then ashes from the volcanoes flew up and created the atmosphere. Later on, the atmosphere created clouds that rained down and created the ocean, and then by the changing temperature of the water the first organisms came to be.
What?
Iron and silicates gravitated together to form the planet. There was always land.
Ashes flying up from volcanos could not create an atmosphere. The early atmosphere was made of toxic (to us) gasses that were also pulled toward the Earth as it was forming.
Quote:
Wait, if jellyfish had to stun fish and eat fish to feed themselves, and fish came after jellyfish then what would jelly fish eat?
Plankton, just like they do now.
Quote:
Plenty of new species came after that like trilobites magically formed from jellyfish and bacteria that still exist today. Later on creatures crawled up on earth and morphed into what we are today and to top it off, it's all it's all based on the "Well Tested" Theory that the Earth and the Moon were created at the same time.
I've heard of no such theory.
Please enlighten me.
Quote:
Which is not likely (not like it could be tested any way), because if they were formed next to each other it would be very un probable because it would be quite a coincidence that they were created at the same time, If it broke off from the Earth it would be altered, and the shape would be a lot different similar to the shape of the earth
The moon was formed when the Earth was still fairly active and was not completely solid. A large object glanced off the Earth, causing part of it to come off and start orbiting. We have solid evidence that the Moon was once a part of the Earth.
Quote:
and other planets in the solar system, which contradicts how they find the absolute age of fossils.
The absolute age of fossils has nothing to do with the Moon. It's found using radiometric dating.
Quote:
The question which this is in response to has been used a lot but can also be used similarly to the concept of evolution by the question: where did the first bit of matter come from? Or where did all the dust floating in space come from? The answer can’t be explained the same way the question about God can because dust is no where near an infinite being that can be created like wise.
None of this has anything to do with evolution.
Quote:
There would have to be an ultimate existence in order for anything to appear.
Logically fallacious.
Quote:
Such as: a half cup can exist as long as a full cup can. Finite life can only exist if there is an ultimate being to give it purpose and potential.
Non sequitur. Finiteness can exist without infinity. Finite numbers are not infinity divided by some other number.
Quote:
If we really evolved from monkeys then where are the others in the evolutionary chain?
Dead.
Quote:
If we evolved from micro organisms every thing would be unstable and constantly changing and mutating uncontrollably or predictably.
Yeah.
What, you think life is completely static and unchanging?
Quote:
The new reproductive system, different from a cell reproducing with itself could not have developed suddenly, it wouldn’t have happened. How could organisms stop reproducing with themselves and grow two new reproductive systems, dependant on other reproductive system within the same time period if it took millions of years, along with the theory in evolution that we developed a body that could live much longer than before. To believe that such a reproductive system could form like that would be unlikely, to think it worked and they found each other within the same time period would be insane.
Organs can develop new purposes that are different from their original use.
Besides that, this is an argumentum ad ignorantium. Just because you don't know, or because it has not been discovered, does not mean that it's impossible. Even if there was no way to know or to find out, that would still not prove evolution wrong.
Quote:
Dinosaurs probably were dragons from the Medieval Times, there skeletal designs seem very similar, and they lived humans as was recorded in the Medieval Times; we believe everything else recorded, why not that?
Who's "we"?
Oh, Christians.
Quote:
So since they lived at the same time as humans we didn’t evolve from them.
Are you trying to look ignorant or are you genuinely oblivious?
Humans did not directly descend from dinosaurs. Even if they did, simultaneous existence does not make descent from dinosaurs impossible. It just means that the species diverged at some point and neither the original species nor the new species died out.
Quote:
The reason for the mass extinction is most likely because they have no reproductive system, but can live for a very long time because of its good body structure, hard scaly rough skin, and they lived in caves. It also says that on the Discovery Channel.
What? No reproductive system?
What the hell are you smoking?
