goshikyuu
the funny thing is that Darwin, supposedly being smart, mentioned that the change between bird and fish were flying fish........Sounds a little out there if you ask me
No he didn't. He used the example of the flying fish as a case where an animal exhibits what could be a primitive form of certain features in the process of adapting to a lifestyle different than that of other fishes, i.e. flying through the air. It was an hypothetical example and a thought experiment on the nature of transitional forms, homologous structures, and modification of body parts for functions they did not originally possess which, over long periods of time, could take on "high degrees of perfection" in their role. Thus he imagined that if flying fish had continued to develope better flying fins, that one day they might have concievably reached a point where they were very well-adapted for living out of the water and catching food on the wing as birds are. Thus, in this imaginary example, who could ever concieve that such a well-suited structure as the imaginary flying creature's wing could have at one time been the fin of a fish, used to locomote in water only?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/education/darwin/origin/oos6_1.htm