Welcome to Gaia! ::


In my history in the ED, i've been deemed....

A racist.

A misogynist.

A Psychopath

Many things have been said. Topics live and die. However, I think that if a person has a controversial opinion...we should try to understand their perspective instead of bashing them for not agreeing with you.


Has anything said to you in the ED changed or impacted your perspective on matters for better or worse?


Anyways..


I have returned.
We all want a healthy ED community and we all want a productive discussion.

Dapper Reveler

Christ the Holy Son
We all want a healthy ED community and we all want a productive discussion.
Who's all?
Avgvsto
Christ the Holy Son
We all want a healthy ED community and we all want a productive discussion.
Who's all?




Gunsmithkitten.

That Rivera guy..

Errr....

You.

Psuedoonkleks or whatever his name is...

Generally ED regs.
Those aren't Ad Hominems, they are insults after your untenable arguments have been thoroughly trounced.

Dapper Reveler

Christ the Holy Son
Avgvsto
Christ the Holy Son
We all want a healthy ED community and we all want a productive discussion.
Who's all?




Gunsmithkitten.

That Rivera guy..

Errr....

You.

Psuedoonkleks or whatever his name is...

Generally ED regs.

Gunsmith surely doesn't mind Ad Homs. And I don't really care what ED looks like at all. What's a productive conversation? If i play fair no one will ever change their minds.
Fermionic
Those aren't Ad Hominems, they are insults after your untenable arguments have been thoroughly trounced.


Oh come now, if anything i've assisted when it comes to Enlightening the ED.

Hell, I may offend once in awhile but....

I never go after a person's character.
Avgvsto
Christ the Holy Son
Avgvsto
Christ the Holy Son
We all want a healthy ED community and we all want a productive discussion.
Who's all?




Gunsmithkitten.

That Rivera guy..

Errr....

You.

Psuedoonkleks or whatever his name is...

Generally ED regs.

Gunsmith surely doesn't mind Ad Homs. And I don't really care what ED looks like at all. What's a productive conversation? If i play fair no one will ever change their minds.


Why do you say "If i play fair no one will ever change their minds."

We're all rational people here, for the most part.
Chitsa Black would be all for this.

What are we talking about?

Dapper Reveler

Fermionic
Those aren't Ad Hominems, they are insults after your untenable arguments have been thoroughly trounced.
Those are pretty similar. Usually I try to separate insults from an argument.

IE
"I agree with you random person, but I must say you are quite a d**k"

Dapper Reveler

Christ the Holy Son
Avgvsto
Christ the Holy Son
Avgvsto
Christ the Holy Son
We all want a healthy ED community and we all want a productive discussion.
Who's all?




Gunsmithkitten.

That Rivera guy..

Errr....

You.

Psuedoonkleks or whatever his name is...

Generally ED regs.

Gunsmith surely doesn't mind Ad Homs. And I don't really care what ED looks like at all. What's a productive conversation? If i play fair no one will ever change their minds.


Why do you say "If i play fair no one will ever change their minds."

We're all rational people here, for the most part.
People are only willing to accept logic in an emotional way. It's like the allegorical cave, no matter how logical you are no one will accept that the shadows aren't the fully real version of reality because they couldn't know that without their emotions allowing them to understand life from a certain perspective.
Avgvsto
Christ the Holy Son
Avgvsto
Christ the Holy Son
Avgvsto
Christ the Holy Son
We all want a healthy ED community and we all want a productive discussion.
Who's all?




Gunsmithkitten.

That Rivera guy..

Errr....

You.

Psuedoonkleks or whatever his name is...

Generally ED regs.

Gunsmith surely doesn't mind Ad Homs. And I don't really care what ED looks like at all. What's a productive conversation? If i play fair no one will ever change their minds.


Why do you say "If i play fair no one will ever change their minds."

We're all rational people here, for the most part.
People are only willing to accept logic in an emotional way. It's like the allegorical cave, no matter how logical you are no one will accept that the shadows aren't the fully real version of reality because they couldn't know that without their emotions allowing them to understand life from a certain perspective.


Emotions cause bias you're saying?

Dapper Reveler

Christ the Holy Son
Avgvsto
Christ the Holy Son
Avgvsto
Christ the Holy Son




Gunsmithkitten.

That Rivera guy..

Errr....

You.

Psuedoonkleks or whatever his name is...

Generally ED regs.

Gunsmith surely doesn't mind Ad Homs. And I don't really care what ED looks like at all. What's a productive conversation? If i play fair no one will ever change their minds.


Why do you say "If i play fair no one will ever change their minds."

We're all rational people here, for the most part.
People are only willing to accept logic in an emotional way. It's like the allegorical cave, no matter how logical you are no one will accept that the shadows aren't the fully real version of reality because they couldn't know that without their emotions allowing them to understand life from a certain perspective.


Emotions cause bias you're saying?
Yes of course, for instance you are emotionally inclined to favor "civilized"/somewhat stoic conversations when conversing about somewhat deeper matters, which is why we are having this discussion in the first place.
Avgvsto
Fermionic
Those aren't Ad Hominems, they are insults after your untenable arguments have been thoroughly trounced.
Those are pretty similar. Usually I try to separate insults from an argument.

IE
"I agree with you random person, but I must say you are quite a d**k"


Not really.
You are a d**k, therefore your argument is flawed- Ad Hominem.
Your argument is flawed (because of X and Y) and offensive, and you are a d**k- Insult

The similar factor is that there is an insult.
Fermionic
Avgvsto
Fermionic
Those aren't Ad Hominems, they are insults after your untenable arguments have been thoroughly trounced.
Those are pretty similar. Usually I try to separate insults from an argument.

IE
"I agree with you random person, but I must say you are quite a d**k"


Not really.
You are a d**k, therefore your argument is flawed- Ad Hominem.
Your argument is flawed (because of X and Y) and offensive, and you are a d**k- Insult

The similar factor is that there is an insult.



If P, then Q

Quick Reply

Submit
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get GCash
Offers
Get Items
More Items
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff
Gaia's Games
Mini-Games
Play with GCash
Play with Platinum