Welcome to Gaia! ::

do you think circumcision is cruel and mutilation?

YES! 0.43554006968641 43.6% [ 250 ]
NO! 0.56445993031359 56.4% [ 324 ]
Total Votes:[ 574 ]
< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 171 172 173 > >> >>> »|
Red Ilsa
Leo X Astaroth
No doctors dont go around saying "Get Circumcised its great!" but they dont go around saying " Its horrible dont do it!" either, its not reccomended but also not dis-credited, and stop listing biased studies, how many times do I have to say it, for as many people that say its bad, there is just as many who say it isnt.


Please, for the love of reason, logic, and facts, go put on your tinfoil hat and join the Flat Earth Society. Arguing with you is like repeatedly smashing my head against a brick wall.

You are wrong. You are so wrong that you look like a fruitbat. You need to go back to your conspiracy theories.


Ill take you seriously once you stop reading what some researcher did in a lab and actually go out in to the world, ask real circumcised men how they feel about it, then come back with the results.
Leo X Astaroth
Mr Ransom 2
Baised studies, what in the bloody hell are you talking about? those are major medical organizations


And? They arent the entire medical world. They are biased because circumcision has NOT been proved harmfull or beneficial, and most factions reccomend for it or against it from personal feelings.


I agree with Red IIsa's last post and consider yourself on my ignore list, having an opinion is one thing, but denying facts is another.
Mr Ransom 2
Leo X Astaroth
Mr Ransom 2
Baised studies, what in the bloody hell are you talking about? those are major medical organizations


And? They arent the entire medical world. They are biased because circumcision has NOT been proved harmfull or beneficial, and most factions reccomend for it or against it from personal feelings.


I agree with Red IIsa's last post and consider yourself on my ignore list, having an opinion is one thing, but denying facts is another.


I find it sad that because someone doesnt share your views they are wrong, denying facts? The whole point is that there are NO facts on circumcision, god why are people so dumb, I suggest you go become a doctor or hold a study of your own before you go around making up your own so called 'facts'
Mr Ransom 2
!d!ot Amer!ca
          I don't care what other people do.
          I'm getting my sons circumcised though.
          That's my belief.
          I respect other people's beliefs, so they should respect mine.
          User Image


User Image - Blocked by "Display Image" Settings. Click to show.
-> 100+ Green Day icons. <-
[Green Day Fan For 12+ Years.]


Might I suggest getting your clitoral hood cut off first, so you can see how it feels and how much you like having over 60% of your sexual pleasure taken away from you, all because it looks better.

question
She's doing it because of her belief not looks.
Respect that, as I do.
I agree with you though, I believe that circumcision is wrong - but I don't like to force my opinion on anybody especially when they've already asked politely to understand theirs.
Leo X Astaroth
Tute Sweet
Leo X Astaroth
All the uncut people say its wrong surprised what a shock /sarcasm stare


My husband is circumcised. He is against circumcision for non-medical reasons.
Because of the things he has told me about it, I am against circumcision for non-medical reasons.

And yes, it does greatly reduce sexual pleasure.
My husband had to be circumcised at 17 for medical reasons. He tells me that the difference between sex before he was cut and sex after he was cut, is like the difference between seeing in colour and seeing in black and white.

That's right; you will never feel the full extent of sexual pleasure, just because your parents preferred the look of a circumcised p***s.
Sucks to be you.


Being circumcised at 17 is diffrent than having it done as an infant, And no it does not reduce sexual pleasure, trus tme I can garuntee that, and there is a huge diffrence from having your p***s circumcised at birth than doing it when your developing as a teenager.


How do you know it doesn't reduce sexual pleasure? Have you tried both? No. You're just saying that because you don't want to think that Mumsy and Daddykins made a bad choice.

And how exactly is it different? The only difference is that you can't remember it, and that you haven't had the opportunity to experience fully sensitive sex.
The surgery is the same, no matter how old you are.

Leo X Astaroth

Ill take you seriously once you stop reading what some researcher did in a lab and actually go out in to the world, ask real circumcised men how they feel about it, then come back with the results.

That is exactly what I have done, and what I have explained to you in the above post... and yet you fail to see it admit it.
Im for it, i c no problem with it
...
honestly why do people complain
about the stupidest things
instead of talking about whos p***s got a
pice of extra skin snipped off,
how about a chat on world hunger or war? rolleyes
Tute Sweet
Leo X Astaroth
Tute Sweet
Leo X Astaroth
All the uncut people say its wrong surprised what a shock /sarcasm stare


My husband is circumcised. He is against circumcision for non-medical reasons.
Because of the things he has told me about it, I am against circumcision for non-medical reasons.

And yes, it does greatly reduce sexual pleasure.
My husband had to be circumcised at 17 for medical reasons. He tells me that the difference between sex before he was cut and sex after he was cut, is like the difference between seeing in colour and seeing in black and white.

That's right; you will never feel the full extent of sexual pleasure, just because your parents preferred the look of a circumcised p***s.
Sucks to be you.


Being circumcised at 17 is diffrent than having it done as an infant, And no it does not reduce sexual pleasure, trus tme I can garuntee that, and there is a huge diffrence from having your p***s circumcised at birth than doing it when your developing as a teenager.


How do you know it doesn't reduce sexual pleasure? Have you tried both? No. You're just saying that because you don't want to think that Mumsy and Daddykins made a bad choice.

And how exactly is it different? The only difference is that you can remember it, and that you haven't had the opportunity to experience fully sensitive sex.
The surgery is the same, no matter how old you are.

Leo X Astaroth

Ill take you seriously once you stop reading what some researcher did in a lab and actually go out in to the world, ask real circumcised men how they feel about it, then come back with the results.

That is exactly what I have done, and what I have explained to you in the above post... and yet you fail to see it admit it.


How do I know the diffrence? Simple, because Ive been with both guys that have been cut and uncut, there has never been any diffrence, or any problem, its never felt bad or diffrent for either party, and if you have done that then it leads me to wonder where you actually asked these people, because almost everyone Ive met that is circumcised has had no problems AT ALL with it, And no not really Im not saying this just because I want to think my parents made a right choice, Im saying it because it bugs me that some people are so ignorant that they cant accept other peoples view and if they dont agree then they must be wrong/in denial/clue-less, do a little more research without including the word "mutlitation" in your search and you mgiht find that there is a lot of view both for and against circumcision, its a debated topic that over the years always yeilded the same results because neither side can prove its harmfull or benefical.
akageoffrey's avatar
  • 250
  • 100
  • 100
Well scientifically speaking there is no legitimate reason for circumcision. It doesn't provide any health benefits, hygiene or otherwise. It's mostly done now because it's tradition and many people are used to it.
Leo X Astaroth
Tute Sweet
Leo X Astaroth
Tute Sweet
Leo X Astaroth
All the uncut people say its wrong surprised what a shock /sarcasm stare


My husband is circumcised. He is against circumcision for non-medical reasons.
Because of the things he has told me about it, I am against circumcision for non-medical reasons.

And yes, it does greatly reduce sexual pleasure.
My husband had to be circumcised at 17 for medical reasons. He tells me that the difference between sex before he was cut and sex after he was cut, is like the difference between seeing in colour and seeing in black and white.

That's right; you will never feel the full extent of sexual pleasure, just because your parents preferred the look of a circumcised p***s.
Sucks to be you.


Being circumcised at 17 is diffrent than having it done as an infant, And no it does not reduce sexual pleasure, trus tme I can garuntee that, and there is a huge diffrence from having your p***s circumcised at birth than doing it when your developing as a teenager.


How do you know it doesn't reduce sexual pleasure? Have you tried both? No. You're just saying that because you don't want to think that Mumsy and Daddykins made a bad choice.

And how exactly is it different? The only difference is that you can remember it, and that you haven't had the opportunity to experience fully sensitive sex.
The surgery is the same, no matter how old you are.

Leo X Astaroth

Ill take you seriously once you stop reading what some researcher did in a lab and actually go out in to the world, ask real circumcised men how they feel about it, then come back with the results.

That is exactly what I have done, and what I have explained to you in the above post... and yet you fail to see it admit it.


How do I know the diffrence? Simple, because Ive been with both guys that have been cut and uncut, there has never been any diffrence, or any problem, its never felt bad or diffrent for either party, and if you have done that then it leads me to wonder where you actually asked these people, because almost everyone Ive met that is circumcised has had no problems AT ALL with it, And no not really Im not saying this just because I want to think my parents made a right choice, Im saying it because it bugs me that some people are so ignorant that they cant accept other peoples view and if they dont agree then they must be wrong/in denial/clue-less, do a little more research without including the word "mutlitation" in your search and you mgiht find that there is a lot of view both for and against circumcision, its a debated topic that over the years always yeilded the same results because neither side can prove its harmfull or benefical.


That's because men who have been circumcised since infancy don't know the difference, because they have not experienced both.

And are you seriously telling me you've found that circumcised guys have no extra difficulties with using condoms? Really?
Because of all the guys I've ever slept with, only two have had difficulties climaxing when using condoms... and both were circumcised, one of them was perfectly happy with his cut p***s, and thought everyone had problems with condoms (bless his little Jewish cotton socks!)

This is from real life, not studies... although, let's be honest, scientific studies do conclusovely show the same thing.

You believe in evolution, right? Now, why would the human body evolve to have a foreskin if it didn't have a purpose?
And what do you think is the purpose of your parents deciding to snip it off?
akageoffrey's avatar
  • 250
  • 100
  • 100
The men I've talked to who are uncut are a lot more sensitive, so I think I prefer being cut myself, sex lasts longer. rofl
Tute Sweet
Leo X Astaroth
Tute Sweet
Leo X Astaroth
Tute Sweet


My husband is circumcised. He is against circumcision for non-medical reasons.
Because of the things he has told me about it, I am against circumcision for non-medical reasons.

And yes, it does greatly reduce sexual pleasure.
My husband had to be circumcised at 17 for medical reasons. He tells me that the difference between sex before he was cut and sex after he was cut, is like the difference between seeing in colour and seeing in black and white.

That's right; you will never feel the full extent of sexual pleasure, just because your parents preferred the look of a circumcised p***s.
Sucks to be you.


Being circumcised at 17 is diffrent than having it done as an infant, And no it does not reduce sexual pleasure, trus tme I can garuntee that, and there is a huge diffrence from having your p***s circumcised at birth than doing it when your developing as a teenager.


How do you know it doesn't reduce sexual pleasure? Have you tried both? No. You're just saying that because you don't want to think that Mumsy and Daddykins made a bad choice.

And how exactly is it different? The only difference is that you can remember it, and that you haven't had the opportunity to experience fully sensitive sex.
The surgery is the same, no matter how old you are.

Leo X Astaroth

Ill take you seriously once you stop reading what some researcher did in a lab and actually go out in to the world, ask real circumcised men how they feel about it, then come back with the results.

That is exactly what I have done, and what I have explained to you in the above post... and yet you fail to see it admit it.


How do I know the diffrence? Simple, because Ive been with both guys that have been cut and uncut, there has never been any diffrence, or any problem, its never felt bad or diffrent for either party, and if you have done that then it leads me to wonder where you actually asked these people, because almost everyone Ive met that is circumcised has had no problems AT ALL with it, And no not really Im not saying this just because I want to think my parents made a right choice, Im saying it because it bugs me that some people are so ignorant that they cant accept other peoples view and if they dont agree then they must be wrong/in denial/clue-less, do a little more research without including the word "mutlitation" in your search and you mgiht find that there is a lot of view both for and against circumcision, its a debated topic that over the years always yeilded the same results because neither side can prove its harmfull or benefical.


That's because men who have been circumcised since infancy don't know the difference, because they have not experienced both.

And are you seriously telling me you've found that circumcised guys have no extra difficulties with using condoms? Really?
Because of all the guys I've ever slept with, only two have had difficulties climaxing when using condoms... and both were circumcised, one of them was perfectly happy with his cut p***s, and thought everyone had problems with condoms (bless his little Jewish cotton socks!)

This is from real life, not studies... although, let's be honest, scientific studies do conclusovely show the same thing.

You believe in evolution, right? Now, why would the human body evolve to have a foreskin if it didn't have a purpose?
And what do you think is the purpose of your parents deciding to snip it off?


I am seriously serious. Personally Im not for circumcision or against it, Im just saying what Ive experienced and what Ive seen in life, and trust me on this, If having a forsekin would make me even more sensitive Id actually have a problem having sex as id be dripping in less than 2 minutes. And the evolution arguement can be used in many things, we have hair for a reason, no need to cut it, we dont need extra holes, ban peircing, ban gender changing operations, infact if you use the evolution arguement every single cosmetic procedure should be outlawed. What I dont get is, I respect both sides who want to circumcise and who dont, and a LOT of parents respect eachother's decision, why cant others do the same? Going around saying that parents are mutilating their children, that their stupid and dumb, thats not respectfull, its ignorant and selfish.
akageoffrey's avatar
  • 250
  • 100
  • 100
Evolution might be irrelevant at this point, while it may have had a purpose at some time, that doesn't mean it still serves that purpose now. Look at your appendix.
I think it's totally stupid to make a baby go through surgery it doesn't need. I mean you can't put that back. I think it's wrong because the guy doesn't get a choice in the matter.
Walegrin
I think it's totally stupid to make a baby go through surgery it doesn't need. I mean you can't put that back. I think it's wrong because the guy doesn't get a choice in the matter.


Babies dont get a choice in many many things, do you think then all parents are being monsterously cruel to their kids because they are deciding something for them? The choices your parents made make you who you are, If we took away even one right away from them wede have to take other rights away.
The Lori
Mr Ransom 2
!d!ot Amer!ca
          I don't care what other people do.
          I'm getting my sons circumcised though.
          That's my belief.
          I respect other people's beliefs, so they should respect mine.
          User Image


User Image - Blocked by "Display Image" Settings. Click to show.
-> 100+ Green Day icons. <-
[Green Day Fan For 12+ Years.]


Might I suggest getting your clitoral hood cut off first, so you can see how it feels and how much you like having over 60% of your sexual pleasure taken away from you, all because it looks better.

question
She's doing it because of her belief not looks.
Respect that, as I do.
I agree with you though, I believe that circumcision is wrong - but I don't like to force my opinion on anybody especially when they've already asked politely to understand theirs.


I would like to know her reason, I would bet anything, its going to be something like "its cleaner" "its healthier" "it looks better" or something like that.

Quick Reply

Submit
Manage Your Items
Other Stuff
Get Items
Get Gaia Cash
Where Everyone Hangs Out
Other Community Areas
Virtual Spaces
Fun Stuff