Leo X Astaroth
And I could just as easily debunk all those blown up "risks" That your rabbling on about, and no, a 35 year old UNCIRCUMCISED man would not know more than, especially not if hese ignorant enough to shove his views down other peoples throats who do not want it at all. I think he has some serious control issues, its one thing to tell people your opinion and how you feel but its dead ignorant and selfish when you persistantly push your views on them in an effort to change their minds. In the end, Not your kids, and as said before, Mnid your own business, you wouldnt like people coming up to trying to tell you what to do with your baby.
Most risks are not blown up, I feel you're biased and not willing to listen as you are all "my way or the high way" about it. I do listen, I just know not to trust a study in Africa where men are given condoms when they're circumcised, where it's unfair to the uncircumcised men. Plus, I won't believe a study about adult men getting stds when they're the ones ******** around without condoms. I have common sense here, I know why they started circumcision. It was a way to prevent masturbation and promiscuity (this is also why they do female circumcision,unfortunately no one sees that about male) , there's truly no health benefits. They used to say masturbation causes blindness, you've likely masturbated (that's hard to deny for anyone, sorry ) , you're not blind right?
I'm not in other business, no one has to listen to me, this is a forum and this person was asking about opinions, if I disagree with you, I'm going to challenge you. You challenge anti-circumcision people , saying this is wrong makes you look like a hypocrite.