Lanackse-Kanvae
Aven Donn
Slutty_Eddie
Aven Donn
So far I haven't been convinced that they're anything more than just shinier and more expensive products with a more streamlined interface out of the box, as opposed to having to customize your own, which takes effort.
Apple makes a computer appliance for people who want to treat their computer like an appliance, and people who want a computer appliance have Apple to turn to.
People like you don't matter, you're not in the loop.
Complaining about Apple's closed system is like complaining that feminine hygiene products don't also come in manlier packages in case a man wants one.
They're not for you.
Get over it.
...
What?
Let me translate:
You are not the target demographic for Apple, just like you're not the target demographic for lady hygiene products. You're not bitching about the packing for the aforementioned lady hygiene products being "unmanly" therefore you're going firmly into hypocrite territory by doing the same to Apple.
Before you start, I'm not an Apple Fangirl. Apart from a little dabbling, I've been exclusively using Windows since 3.1 and was using MSDOS before that.
However, I do have the wisdom to see that some people like apples and some people like oranges. Heck I've seen people that like limes. It's their money, their decision.
The argument still makes no sense. Macs and PCs ARE for the same purpose. Personal computing, office computing, work computing, gaming and creativity computing. In other words, COMPUTING. People consider Macs or PCs. Meanwhile men have no reason to consider female menstrual products. And I'm not bitching about the packaging of the product, I'm bitching that it's the packaging that is making it so overpriced. Macs are NOT BAD COMPUTERS. They just make you pay WAY MORE for the same quality. Where does the extra money go towards? Apart from their profit, you're paying for the looks of the device. And right now, Apple is popular, because Apple is popular. More and more people want Apple products just because everyone else has Apple products. Yes, the same was true for PC, and the same criticisms applied when cheaper and perhaps equal quality options were available. (Not speaking of Windows exclusively. Speaking PC) But Apple are even more overpriced. There's no reason to get a Mac other than the looks. Macs are only going to be better if the price is not an issue. Well, there's compatibility but they're really working hard on that.
Some people like apples, some people like oranges. But apples and oranges aren't used for the same purpose, are they? When you want to make a citrus pie, you can't use an apple.
As opposed to you, I have way too much Mac experience for my liking. They're not bad computers, not at all. But they're different and their alternative to Windows Explorer is just... Bad. Lack of a proper taskbar is another poor design choice in my opinion. But again, my opinion here. What ISN'T strictly my opinion, is how overpriced a Mac is. My top tier gaming rig costs just a bit more than THE CHEAPEST MacBook Pro laptops. (Current gen) PLEASE correct me if I'm mistaken.
When did I complain about Apple's closed system too? Windows is a closed system, so what?
And what's the spiel about treating computers like appliances? Windows somehow doesn't let you do that? I seriously don't get it. Macs are for people who just want to use computers? Okay... So how come Windows is somehow worse for that? More viruses? No longer really true since Macs became mainstream. PC viruses stem from misuse. Mac viruses stem from misuse. Download porn and toolbars, you'll get viruses on both.
To sum it up, the argument doesn't make any sense because Macs and Windows are meant for the same purpose, not for entirely different people. Because when I want to buy a computer, I have to choose, PC or Mac. Unlike having to choose between buying a tampon or not buying a tampon as a man. (For personal use, that is. Disregard that tampons and pads actually have alternative uses)