| |
PricelessPumpkinPrincess Lucy the Vampire PricelessPumpkinPrincess Lucy the Vampire Karutan Koremanu Lucy the Vampire Definitely, kays, another debate! Question! Thingy...
The Cullen's "Superpowers"
I think it's stupid, the moment a vamp book mentions teleporting vamp who have telekinesis, I close it.
Thoughts? This is why I call them Meyerpires. They are not real vampires in any way, shape, or form.
Oooh, smart! I disliked the throwing away of the true blue way of biting and fangs, Meyerpires "bite" a.k.a. "tear" vampires (not capitalized!) bite, and their elongated canines add drama and flair to a vampire, really sharp teeth are boring in vampires. BUT, a meyerpire doesn't have the true ability of turning someone into a vampire. Most vampires use their snake-like fangs to bite into the major blood vessels and transmit a venom like thing. When you tear, you can't target, and, therefore, you're ONE not getting all blood--more tissues and other things surrounding the arteries--and TWO can't direct venom to turn someone into a vampire.
So how do Meyerpires exist??? O.o
In a vampire book I'm writing, there are three types of vampires, two of the types can create Dhampirs of their types, and the other can make true vampires of any random type, the vampire can't control it. Again, EXACTLY. The first part, at least. It's fiction--anything goes--but its' very unrealistic to have a vampire that bites that way. In my book (Damn, are we ALL writing vampire books? I'm a procrastinator. Mine's taken years to get half-way xD) the average vampire is born with the instinct ability to sense where major arteries are while those who are turned into vampires have to learn it. If you're aimlessly biting, you're not going to get pure blood. Just tainted blood mixed with other bodily fluids and materials.
@Chaotic: DUH. She ripped off a bunch of other books (I said this yesterday and I only read a portion of those books a while ago and forgot the titles and such. Forgive me. I'm a sucker for excepts xD) with most of the good lines. You know the one where she described Edward in such depth with the sparkling? That was from another book where someone was describing someone sparkling in the MOONLIGHT. That's where the original idea of sparkling came from, anyway--the sparkling in the Moonlight. The sunlight thing was unique, but she really couldn't pull it of. As far as I know, at least, with the line thing. OR she just thinks very much like that author.
@Lucy: Don't forget
In the Forests of the Night
by Amelia somethingoranother ( ^-^' )
@onxy: No, it's not very interesting. It's repetetive, unoriginal, badly written, and highely unbelievable, even for a fiction novel. I WILL admit that there were some extremely interesting bits, but, the more I searched, the more I found that they weren't hers. I dare you to look up the bst parts and you will find them in some other work. Also, that post was kinda hard to understand... could you please try to be a bit more literate in the discussion threads?
@
Cool idea! ^.^
Oooh! Brainstorm! (I love that word) Vampire types are called Rads, Mods, and Vics. Mods and Vics are more powerful than Rads, therefore have less venom and turning people into true vampires is a 5 out of 10 chance for them, Rads are weaker, so they have a higher amount of venom, their chances are 8 out of 10 for true vampires.
I always leave books off, but I'm doing NaNoWriMo this year...
Amelia Atwater-Rhodes? Haven't read that one, but i did read her Hawksong books, good, but I stopped at Snakecharm. wink
|
 |
