Aporeia
(?)Community Member
- Report Post
- Posted: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 04:22:27 +0000
Blue Day Book
False Dichotomy
Blue Day Book
I've wondered this ever since the awful Avatar: The Last Airbender movie came out. In the movie, the firebenders had to have a source of fire around them (burning candle, lamp, etc.) in order to bend, just like water, earth, and air benders can only bend when their element is around them in some fashion.
But why is fire bending in Avatar: Legend of Korra and in the original cartoon series different? Fire just comes out of people's hands and feet. They don't need to have a source of fire around them in order to bend it. But with water bending, water has to be around them in order to bend, and with earth, earth has to be within access for them to bend.
Why is fire different?
But why is fire bending in Avatar: Legend of Korra and in the original cartoon series different? Fire just comes out of people's hands and feet. They don't need to have a source of fire around them in order to bend it. But with water bending, water has to be around them in order to bend, and with earth, earth has to be within access for them to bend.
Why is fire different?
Air bending also seems to be ever-present. You can literally exhale, and it's enough to air bend with. Water bending seems to be capable with any water-based solution, blood included. Earth bending is the only one that's massively based on surroundings, and Toph found a roundabout way of solving that problem.
Fire is breath, you need breath to do it, and you need a focus, an inner flame of some kind (metaphorically speaking)
But there is water in the blood, and in sweat, so that makes sense. But there is not fire in people's breath. People don't breathe out fire ordinarily. Air bending makes sense as well, because air is nearly everywhere, and people can generate their own air with which to bend by breathing. Fire is the only one that does not seem to make any sense.
What is a firebender but an airbender with different limits?