♥♥♥SSMv2♥♥♥~*DELICIOUS* Requests Closed!

What is your art style?

Anime!	27.5%	[ 47 ]
Realism	7.6%	[ 13 ]
American comic	4.1%	[ 7 ]
Anime x realism	25.1%	[ 43 ]
mixed media	8.2%	[ 14 ]
I can't explain..	18.7%	[ 32 ]
Other? tell me!	8.8%	[ 15 ]
Total Votes:			[ 171 ]

[Hailvane]

could you sketch my avi? elegant and sexy like?
><;
suggestion: maybe you could make a list of all the people you want to draw so we know to send the trade when the bank is up and running.

my shoppe

[Aur0na]

I'd love to get a sketch of one of more of my OCs. :3

[Alric]

[Nuk]

[Aurona]

[Evelyn]

You can pick which one you'd prefer to do. ^^

[Cha-Chiyu]

please sketch my current avatar^_^
ill pay 700

[laurieneth]

Hailvane

could you sketch my avi? elegant and sexy like?
><;
suggestion: maybe you could make a list of all the people you want to draw so we know to send the trade when the bank is up and running.

my shoppe

sure, good idea! I will make a list as I go ^^

[laurieneth]

heart

[laurieneth]

heart

[laurieneth]

The conclusion that O 16 r 1 does not apply is not the end of the matter. The power in O 16 to enter judgment for a defendant makes explicit provision for what is, in any event, the court's inherent jurisdiction to protect its processes from abuse by summarily disposing of an action as being frivolous or vexatious where the action is so obviously untenable that it cannot possibly succeed: Burton v The Shire of Bairnsdale (190 cool 7 CLR 76 at 92. Order 1 r 3A provides that "[t]he inherent power of the court to control the conduct of a proceeding is not affected by the Rules". Further, the inherent power of the court to control its own proceedings extends to third party proceedings: O'Donohue v Nolton (WASC, Kennedy J, Lib No 4967, 13 March 1981, unreported, at 4). A third party has standing to initiate an inquiry by the court as to whether or not its processes are being abused on the basis that the plaintiff's claim is frivolous or vexatious or that it is so obviously untenable that it cannot possibly succeed: Mondo, above, at [31]–[34].

[laurieneth]

Express covenants Unlike an implied covenant as to quiet enjoyment,1 an express covenant may be construed2 to extend to interruption by persons claiming by title paramount3 or other specified4 third parties.5 An express covenant is commonly expressed to be subject to the lessee otherwise complying with the provisions of the lease, such as the payment of rent.6 Compliance with such provisions are not conditions precedent to compliance with the covenant of quiet enjoyment.7

[laurieneth]

Estoppel is generally only a defense that prevents a representor from enforcing legal rights, or from relying on a set of facts that would give rise to enforceable rights (e.g. words said or actions performed) if that enforcement or reliance would be unfair to the representee. Because its effect is to defeat generally enforceable legal rights, the scope of the remedy is often limited. Note, however, that proprietary estoppel (applicable in English land law) can be both a sword and a shield and the scope of its remedy is wide.

For an example of estoppel, consider the case of a debtor and a creditor. The creditor might unofficially inform the debtor that the debt has been forgiven. Even if the original contract was not terminated, the creditor may be estopped from collecting the debt if the creditor changes its position later. It would be unfair to allow the creditor to change their mind in light of the unofficial agreement he made with the debtor beforehand. In the same way, a landlord might inform a tenant that rent has been reduced, for example, if there was construction or a lapse in utility services. If the tenant relies on this notice, the landlord could be estopped from collecting the full rent.

[laurieneth]

rofl

[laurieneth]

CherryLettie!

[neoloverwu]

Current avatar?
Holding snake while lying down on side like lying on a couch? Like the Titanic painting, lying on the side but holding snake.
Will pay 500g+

heart

[laurieneth]

heart

[laurieneth]

heart

[laurieneth]

Aur0na!