Moonblossom
Ultimate Cheermaster
Offline
Post: 47936209_5371 created on Wed Jul 15, 2009 6:21 pmPosted: Wed Jul 15, 2009 6:21 pm
![]() |
That's fine, but choosing to avoid something simply because it's popular is as bad as reading it simply because it's popular :/
I actually read Twilight and thought they were hilarious fluff. I enjoyed them in the sense that they gave me something to do for a few hours, but I would not run out and suggest people read them. More like "If you're stuck in an airport terminal with nothing to do for four hours, they provide amusing time-wasting" Harry Potter, however, is a series I think everyone should try at least once. As for Wizard of Oz, I found they got asinine and repetitive after the fourth book. The first one was beautiful and orginal, Ozma was interesting and gave a fresh perspective, and after that they were just "more of the same, more of the same". I also completely ignore Ruth Plumley's contributions, I don't even consider them part of the same series. |
|












