I'm looking through this forum and I'm starting to think I'm the only one with any talent and training. If you guys have questions on how to become better ask them here, ok?
So are you always this much of an a**, or are you just really trying hard to piss people off? The way I see it is you're either clueless or you're trying way too hard.
And if you want critique, which should be the only reason you should be posting here, I think most of it's been said in your other post. It's a photo of a figure with some lighting that seems as if it's against a slightly ruffled sheet. There isn't a lot that's interesting with it.
So are you always this much of an a**, or are you just really trying hard to piss people off? The way I see it is you're either clueless or you're trying way too hard.
And if you want critique, which should be the only reason you should be posting here, I think most of it's been said in your other post. It's a photo of a figure with some lighting that seems as if it's against a slightly ruffled sheet. There isn't a lot that's interesting with it.
nothing you said made any sense because you're wrong about everything.
here is an example of a the same style of photography done by another photographer. You'll notice that the background is even more simplified and the shadows are less pronounced. The idea is still the same because the only point of reference is the object itself.
This is a photographic style.
Learn what that means. You aren't a photography critics.