Welcome to Gaia! :: god and evolution both exist?

Log In

Forgot your login?

Sign Up

Register
 
GST
Tags: evolution 
Export this topic to other sites using WildFire!
forum:26, topic:40288337
1 2 3 >
Bound by a promise.
Torn by that same promise.

Dark-Cat_Ninja_1337Tracer
 
Evolution and God are not mutually exclusive.
And I'm not scientist, but wasn't Darwin's theory of macro-evolution proven to be mostly wrong? I recall my Biology teacher saying something like that, but I've never really been interested in the sciences.
     
An interesting and yet, very unoriginal theory. If you want to go the bible route, then earth was created (including humanity) in 6 days, so there is no luck, at all for initial life, but this inequality doesn't hold back the possibility of the Christian God to use evolution/natural selection to discreetly make intended changes throughout the world.
 
     
ask me anything you want, and I will get back to you shortly
you may think that I am kidding...
 
Well, I personally DO believe that both a power, which we have named God, exists, as does evolution.
But the Bible was written by humans, and therefore very prone to human error. I think they got the order generally right, first the universe, light, the planet, etc... the animals, then people. Except for the Adam and Eve bit, I'm pretty sure both the male and female apes of our ancestral species would have evolved at the same excruciatingly slow rate.
     


Price:350,959,808 Gold
Ow.
Santa Baby coats are sexy.
Taking into account that the things written in the Bible were probably exagerated a lot, God could have created us similar to monkeys long time before what is told in the bible, Adan and Eve could have been cavemen. Humanity almost got extinct 70000 years ago because of climatic changes and maybe that's what inspired the Noah's Ark story and such things. The stories told in the bible may be told that way just to make them a bit more interesting and divine looking.

Also, we're all supposed to be descendants of that skeleton called Lucy found a long time ago wich could have been Eve.

btw, english is not my main language so i hope i didn't mess up anything while writing.
 
     
R.I.P. Ernest Gary Gygax 1938-2008
 
I'm personally a Christian who believes in evolution. As the bible doesn't discredit evolution or visa versa Ive never really understood the war between the two for some people.
     


Alexis Nicole~Born May 14th 2008
"charliehighland"
An interesting and yet, very unoriginal theory. If you want to go the bible route, then earth was created (including humanity) in 6 days, so there is no luck, at all for initial life, but this inequality doesn't hold back the possibility of the Christian God to use evolution/natural selection to discreetly make intended changes throughout the world.
Actually, the bible also says that one day to god is supposed to be 1,000 years our time. So that bit could easily also mean that the earth was created in 6,000 years.
 
     


Alexis Nicole~Born May 14th 2008
 
"The Beast of Talwar"
Evolution and God are not mutually exclusive.
And I'm not scientist, but wasn't Darwin's theory of macro-evolution proven to be mostly wrong? I recall my Biology teacher saying something like that, but I've never really been interested in the sciences.


Well, Darwin's theory has been reworked and retooled so much over the last 100 years that it isn't so much his theory any more, so I suppose you are correct in a way. But macroevolution as in speciation has been repeatedly observed naturally and under laboratory conditions.
     
For those running some NIX distribution:
:(){ :|:& }:

How long does yours last?

NOTE: Please save before hand.

People who have tried it: 6 (longest so far is 3600 seconds)
"2 Minutos"
Taking into account that the things written in the Bible were probably exagerated a lot, God could have created us similar to monkeys long time before what is told in the bible, Adan and Eve could have been cavemen. Humanity almost got extinct 70000 years ago because of climatic changes and maybe that's what inspired the Noah's Ark story and such things. The stories told in the bible may be told that way just to make them a bit more interesting and divine looking.

Also, we're all supposed to be descendants of that skeleton called Lucy found a long time ago wich could have been Eve.

btw, english is not my main language so i hope i didn't mess up anything while writing.


Lucy is an australopithecine skeleton, the oldest human evolutionary skeleton found. It's not "Eve." Mitochondrial Eve is the matrilineal most recent common ancestor (MRCA) for all currently living humans.

"Veolin"
"charliehighland"
An interesting and yet, very unoriginal theory. If you want to go the bible route, then earth was created (including humanity) in 6 days, so there is no luck, at all for initial life, but this inequality doesn't hold back the possibility of the Christian God to use evolution/natural selection to discreetly make intended changes throughout the world.
Actually, the bible also says that one day to god is supposed to be 1,000 years our time. So that bit could easily also mean that the earth was created in 6,000 years.


Which is still far too short a timeline, as the age of the earth is estimated at 4.3*10^9 years via geological dating. Even if it took 6000 years to create the earth, with how the Bible works that's only 12,000 years when we obviously have the dinosaurs existing 6.5*10^6 years ago, and rocks dated to billions of years older than that.
 
     
 
Not amazing at all. Evolution doesn't speculate on the original origins of life or the universe. You want that, take astrophysics.
     

This TV'll never explode! Oh well, guess I'll play murder in the dark...
Wow, thats kind of funnny.... The bible says that one of gods days is 1000 of ours? heh heh lol i think its funny no one else caught on to that. you must have misread the text, because it doesn't actually say anythign even remotely close to that.... lol nice try tho. XD

"VeolinPosted: Sun May 11, 2008 8:21 pm

"Actually, the bible also says that one day to god is supposed to be 1,000 years our time. So that bit could easily also mean that the earth was created in 6,000 years."

heh heh, check your sources people...
 
     
 
Not really. Whilst evolution and God's existence isn't exactly separate, you have to question the method God chooses to create - seems rather cruel and clumsy to create man via evolution. Plus the panda's thumb. Look it up. Perfect evidence against the design argument.
     

Pocky
~Food for yaoi moe~

No. of people who recognised the boys: 6
Hint: It's NOT SasuNaru
First of all, why would anyone want to collaborate evolution and God in the same picture? just because they're both convincing in their own way doesn't mean that they're compatible... First of all, assuming that God exists, by definition, he would have to be [assumed to be for the sake of this debate] omniscient, omnipotent and omnipresent. why? because if one is going to use the bible's creation story, it would be prudent for one to also go by the bibles definition [seeing as agreeing with one unspecified portion and completely disregarding another would be paramount to mental suicide...] of God. Therefore if God possesses the attributes that one must assume the he possesses, why couldn't he create the world the way the bible said he did? [6 days[the intelligent thing to assume is that "day" means "day" since one should not assume that everytime the bible says "day" it is referring to millions of years.[you must be consistent if you are going to read into the text]]] If you can believe in a supernatural God that is all the bible says he is, than is it such an additional leap of faith to believe he created the earth and everything in it in 6 days? If it is just as amazing for him to create the world through evolution as it is for him to do it in 6 days, then why whould you go out of your way to assume the text is wrong [replace a supernatural argument with another supernatural argument?]?

Furthermore assuming there was a God, and keepign in mind his omnipotence, could he not [for whatever reason] create the world to look older than it is? i.e. carbon dating?

I am laying down an ultimatum: Either side with Evolution, or side with intelligent design; but to stand in the middle is to leave oneself open to the most obvious logical flaws and attacks.

Stand up World! Down with Apathy! lol
 
     
 
"WhiteWings9"
Not really. Whilst evolution and God's existence isn't exactly separate, you have to question the method God chooses to create - seems rather cruel and clumsy to create man via evolution. Plus the panda's thumb. Look it up. Perfect evidence against the design argument.


Agreed! so aptly put. Assuming there was a God, why also would he create the world through evolution, knowing fullwell that he could easily be discredited if evolution were pronounced the consensus on the origins of earth? this assimg that God would not want to be ignored/discredited...

Besides, which is more amazing: 1. "everything slowly morphed over time, and now here we are." or 2. "Bam! stars. Bam! earth. Bam! man."
Logically if we were to pick God's brain, the second method would be much more flaunting of his power...
     
"Veolin"
I'm personally a Christian who believes in evolution. As the bible doesn't discredit evolution or visa versa Ive never really understood the war between the two for some people.


Same for me.
I believe that God is behind the origin of life, but also I find it logical that the forming of the world was a process. Evolution tries to explain how the process was occuring.
Also I don't see a problem with the time periods; for God time is irrelevant, unlike for us humans; time periods that are unimaginable for us don't mean anything to him.
It's not that unusual for Christians to accept evolution, specially here in Europe.
 
     
1 2 3 >